Act of Reparation for “Luce-fer” mascot
Over the transom, this blasphemous boomer karen train wreck showed up at a TLM parish All Saints party today.
Here is the full cross-post from NonVeni Mark’s place of a reader-suggested Act of Reparation against the Tranny Queer Witch Jubilee mascot.
From the combox…
Come, let us atone for Rome’s 2025 Jubilee Mascot:
DOWNLOADABLE PRAYERS (PDF) | LATIN + ENGLISH
Does the reader reside in the Papal Apartment? No.
Does he include ‘Vicar of Christ’ in his C.V.? No.
Is he the pope? No.
These things the reader has in common with the Argentinian apostate, Jorge Bergoglio, whose latest act of treachery against God, His Christ, His Church, His Saints and His flock – timed to correspond with the traditional (i.e. authentic) Feast of Christ the King – is “Luce”, the insidious androgynous and rainbow Rosary wearing witch ‘mascot’ for the upcoming Jubilee Year, 2025 A.D.
In modern parlance, Jubilee Years are ‘a very big deal’; they come but once every fifty (50) years and are a year of Mercy: a special year of remission of sins, debts and of universal pardon; a time when the Mercy is God is on display and prevailing, and is thus more generous and accessible.
The wicked dimensions of this diabolical mockery are covered by Miss Barnhardt (here) and the reader should familiarise himself with them. To mock God is, amongst many other things, unwise; however to denigrate, revile and blaspheme His Mercy is grotesque and ghoulish.
It is also supremely provocative. Proverbially speaking, this outrage could be the ‘final straw’ and, thus, reparation is of high order. St. Bonaventure tells us that the Deluge was a response to the prevailing crime of the age: lust, as cold water cools carnal desires; and that in the last days, when avarice is the order the day, fire from heaven will be required to burn it away.
Without wishing to wade into considerations of who was the last Supreme Pontiff (Pius XII, Ratzinger, or other; ‘Class of 1958’ vs. ‘Class of 2022’; Sede or variant), it must surely be patently clear that this man Bergolio is neither Catholic nor pope, but rather a destroyer and interloper. Simply put: it is not possible that he could validly be Christ’s Vicar. The very notion has descended into dark, sardonic mirth.
If one’s Sensus Fidelium does not tell one that this man is an enemy of God, then it is absent.
If the reader thinks otherwise – and such is immaterial to the dire and urgent need for reparation in the face of this crime – do not let him think that God rewards indifference or languid, innocuous ‘loyalty’. Let him give thought now to how he will answer, when called to Judgement, “Didst thou love me?”; “Where was thine loyalty to Me?” Let him consider too the time-specific warnings of our most Blessed Mother at La Salette (and elsewhere) and weigh the probabilities.
The following selection of reparatory prayers (reproduced in both English + Latin) is of Your correspondent’s own suggestion and, though he be far from a ‘competent authority’, they comprise the Divine Praises (the orthodox supplication in the face of blasphemy), the 3rd Sorrowful Mystery of Rosary, The Crowning with Thorns (where God as man put upon His Head the punishment which He, as God, had given man; thereby ransoming Himself for His creatures) and an abbreviated rendering of Psalm 50, Miserére, the great Penitential Psalm. ‘Miserére’ is Latin for ‘mercy’, which may explain why, when correctly numbered (i.e. Vulgate & Douay Rheims) it is the 50th chapter of the Psalter, just as the Jubilee is the fiftieth year…
Over the transom: “Luce-fer” mascot bears a striking resemblance to credibly accused serial rapist author Neil Gaiman’s character “Coraline”.
I had never seen or heard of this character “Coraline” before, but apparently it’s a well-known children’s book and movie. I only know the name of Neil Gaiman, the sci-fi/fantasy author of “Coraline”, from Vox Day’s reportage of Gaiman being recently exposed as a serial molester and rapist of young girls. So, Gaiman is basically the Marko Rupnik of sci-fi. Great catch by a reader:
Hi Ann,
I’ve discovered something on my own and my Husband urged me to email you about it and if you would like to share what I’ve found on your website you absolutely can. It’s about this “Luce mascot,” that has come about. I thought this Luce character/mascot looked familiar with the yellow hoodie/jacket with blue hair. Then it came to me! It looks like Coraline on that Disney movie “Coraline”, and we all know Disney is evil and perverted, especially since Walt Disney was a 33rd degree freemason, a.k.a. a satanist.
Anyway, I never actually watched Coraline,(and I don’t allow my 12 yr old son to watch anything Disney) but I saw previews of the movie long ago and saw pics of some kids dressed up as Coraline for Halloween. I don’t remember from the previews (because it was so long ago) what the movie was all about, but I remembered what this Coraline character looked like. So I looked it up and was amazed at how fitting the description was for the current Times we are living in!
I will attach three pictures to this email. The first will be the pic of “Luce mascot.” The second will be a pic of Coraline, so you can compare it to the Luce mascot and see how much they look alike. And the third pic will be a screenshot of what it says the movie Coraline is about and I think that YOU will think, “Wow, this is SO fitting with what’s going on in the Catholic Church and the World and NOT really a coincidence at all.” Let me know what you think! Thank you for your time and for your podcasts and website. My Husband, Son and I just LOVE all the memes you post too🥰
Take care Ann and God Bless you!
Sincerely,
J
Even so, Sir.
Today is the Feast of All Souls.
No sin, no impurity can enter into the unveiled presence of the Triune Godhead. A person still attached to sin simply could not bear to be in the full presence of the Holy Trinity, could not look upon the face of God, and looking upon the face of God is what heaven IS. Therefore, those who die in a state of grace, in friendship with Christ, but still have attachment to sin (and almost everyone does), after their Particular Judgment, enter into Purgation to remove all remaining vestiges and attachments to sin before entering into the Beatific Vision. C.S. Lewis explained Purgatory to me very early on in my conversion process:
“Our souls demand Purgatory, don’t they? Would it not break the heart if God said to us, ‘It is true, my son, that your breath smells and your rags drip with mud and slime, but we are charitable here and no one will upbraid you with these things, nor draw away from you. Enter into the joy’? Should we not reply, ‘With submission, sir, and if there is no objection, I’d rather be cleaned first.’ ‘It may hurt, you know’ – ‘Even so, Sir.’
I assume that the process of purification will normally involve suffering. Partly from tradition; partly because most real good that has been done me in this life has involved it. But I don’t think the suffering is the purpose of the purgation. I can well believe that people neither much worse nor much better than I will suffer less than I or more. . . . The treatment given will be the one required, whether it hurts little or much.”
– C.S. Lewis, Letters To Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer, chapter 20, paragraphs 8-9
Here is the eighth movement, “Hostias” from Mozart’s Requiem Mass. This is the last part of the Offertory:
Hostias et preces tibi, Domine, laudis offerimus:
We offer to Thee, O Lord, sacrifices and prayers:
Tu suscipe pro animabus illis, quarum hodie memoriam facimus:
Do Thou receive them in behalf of those souls of whom we make memorial this day.
Fac eas, Domine, de morte transire ad vitam,
Grant them, O Lord, to pass from death to that life,
Quam olim Abrahae promisisti et semini ejus.
Which Thou didst promise of old to Abraham and to his seed.
Every Saint in Heaven Knows that Bergoglio is an Antipope. Never feel like you’re alone. That’s the biggest lie this side of heaven.
Happy, happy feast of All the Saints!!
If you ever feel alone in the knowledge of the Bergoglian Antipapcy and the truth of Pope Benedict’s substantially erroneous “partial resignation” of only “the ministry of the active governance of the Church”, just remember that every Saint and Angel in Heaven knows the truth. His resignation was completely invalid, and therefore he remained the one and only living Pope until his death on 31 December ARSH 2022, whether he liked it or not.
Considering that every star in the universe has a custodian angel, that puts the angelic choir in the QUINTILLIONS, at minimum. Be edified today. Be very, VERY edified. They were all at the Mass you heard today. All of them. They were all right there. They are at EVERY valid Mass. Sit in stillness with that. Go ahead. I’ll wait. ☺️
All ye Saints, pray for the Petrine See, vacant these 671 days and counting, for Holy Mother Church, and pray for us!!
It is no coincidence that Lutheran Revolt day is also Satanism’s highest unholy day of the year – 31 October.
“Christ committed adultery first of all with the women at the well about whom St. John tells us. Was not everybody about Him saying: ‘Whatever has He been doing with her?’ Secondly, with Mary Magdalen, and thirdly with the women taken in adultery whom He dismissed so lightly. Thus even, Christ who was so righteous, must have been guilty of fornication before He died.”
(ref. Trishreden, Weimer Edition, Vol. 2, Pg. 107.)
Luther, an Augustinian priest, was a filthy pervert, looking to ratify and excuse his disgusting, sick perversions and in doing so dragging as many souls into hell with him as possible.
This is Luther. This is the piece of s*** that they are all celebrating as the “great reformer”, including, not surprisingly, Antipope Bergoglio.
Martin Luther was a diabolical narcissist, and, after years of shameless sacrilegious fornication with his concubine, a nun, Katarina von Bora, while a priest – descended into full-blown psychopathy.
We see in today’s world the result of unworthy reception of the Eucharist – a world full of diabolical narcissists unable to think or reason clearly, utterly detached, it seems, from reality. Fornicating priests commit not merely the mortal sins against the 6th Commandment of fornication and adultery, but because the Aggrieved Spouse is Christ Himself and His Holy Church, the sin is that of sacrilege – a sin against the 2nd Commandment. Can you imagine the damage done to such a priest by not only his reception of the Eucharist, but by his very offering of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass? It is said that nothing short of actual satanic “black liturgies”, such as satanic “black masses”, attracts demons like these sins of sacrilegious fornication.
Being a diabolical narcissist, Luther was obsessed with convincing himself of the grandiosity, superiority, perfection and “sinlessness” or better said, “faultlessness” of his false self.
Everything he did and said revolved around his need to convince himself that the fact that he, a priest forever after the Order of Melchizedek, espoused to Jesus Christ and His Holy Church, was fornicating with Katarina von Bora (and apparently also the maid when Katarina “had a headache”) was NO BIG DEAL. This is why Luther despised the priesthood, despised the Eucharist, despised marriage itself, and preached his satanic heresy of “total depravity”. He had to convince himself that his fornicating was not only no big deal, but also “natural”.
This satanic filth is what Antipope Bergoglio is so enamored of, and openly celebrates. I have a theologian friend who firmly believes and argues very well that Antipope Bergoglio is, very simply, a closet Lutheran. I think that it is worse than that – at least Luther could be argued mildly credibly to be a Christian, albeit an arch-heretic. Antipope Bergoglio? No. Not credibly. Antipope Bergoglio is an open apostate.
I have copied these quotes from David L. Gray’s site. Be warned, there is extreme blasphemy here involving Our Lord engaging in sex acts.
Remember, every single one of these quotes is from Luther himself, and is fully acknowledged by the Lutheran sect.
“I look upon God no better than a scoundrel”
(ref. Weimar, Vol. 1, Pg. 487. Cf. Table Talk, No. 963).
“Christ committed adultery first of all with the women at the well about whom St. John tells us. Was not everybody about Him saying: ‘Whatever has He been doing with her?’ Secondly, with Mary Magdalen, and thirdly with the women taken in adultery whom He dismissed so lightly. Thus even, Christ who was so righteous, must have been guilty of fornication before He died.”
(ref. Trishreden, Weimer Edition, Vol. 2, Pg. 107.
“I have greater confidence in my wife and my pupils than I have in Christ”
(ref. Table Talk, 2397b).
“It does not matter how Christ behaved – what He taught is all that matters”
(ref. Erlangen Vol. 29, Pg. 126).
“[The Commandments’] only purpose is to show man his impotence to do good and to teach him to despair of himself”
(ref: Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), Volume III, p. 364).
“We must remove the Decalogue out of sight and heart”
(ref. De Wette 4, 188)
“If we allow them – the Commandments – any influence in our conscience, they become the cloak of all evil, heresies and blasphemies”
(ref. Comm. ad Galat, p.310).
“It is more important to guard against good works than against sin.”
(ref. Trischreden, Wittenberg Edition, Vol. VI., p. 160).
“Good works are bad and are sin like the rest.”
(ref. Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), VOl. III, pg. 47).
“There is no scandal greater, more dangerous, more venomous, than a good outward life, manifested by good works and a pious mode of life. That is the grand portal, the highway that leads to damnation.”
(ref. Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), VOl. II, pg. 128).
“…with regard to God, and in all that bears on salvation or damnation, (man) has no ‘free-will’, but is a captive, prisoner and bond slave, either to the will of God, or to the will of Satan.”
(ref. From the essay, ‘Bondage of the Will,’ ‘Martin Luther: Selections From His Writings, ed. by Dillenberger, Anchor Books, 1962 p. 190).
“Man is like a horse. Does God leap into the saddle? The horse is obedient and accommodates itself to every movement of the rider and goes whither he wills it. Does God throw down the reins? Then Satan leaps upon the back of the animal, which bends, goes and submits to the spurs and caprices of its new rider… Therefore, necessity, not free will, is the controlling principle of our conduct. God is the author of what is evil as well as of what is good, and, as He bestows happiness on those who merit it not, so also does He damn others who deserve not their fate.”
(ref. ‘De Servo Arbitrio’, 7, 113 seq., quoted by O’Hare, in ‘The Facts About Luther, TAN Books, 1987, pp. 266-267).
“His (Judas) will was the work of God; God by His almighty power moved his will as He does all that is in this world.”
(ref. De servo Arbitrio, against man’s free will).
“No good work happens as the result of one’s own wisdom; but everything must happen in a stupor . . . Reason must be left behind for it is the enemy of faith.”
(ref. Trischreden, Weimer VI, 143, 25-35).
“Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong, but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world. We will commit sins while we are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides… No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day.”
(ref. ‘Let Your Sins Be Strong, from ‘The Wittenberg Project;’ ‘The Wartburg Segment’, translated by Erika Flores, from Dr. Martin Luther’s Saemmtliche Schriften, Letter No. 99, 1 Aug. 1521. – Cf. Also Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), VOl. II, pg. 404))
4a
“Do not ask anything of your conscience; and if it speaks, do not listen to it; if it insists, stifle it, amuse yourself; if necessary, commit some good big sin, in order to drive it away. Conscience is the voice of Satan, and it is necessary always to do just the contrary of what Satan wishes.”
(ref. J. Dollinger, La Reforme et les resultants qu’elle a produits. (Trans. E. Perrot, Paris, Gaume, 1848-49), Vol III, pg. 248).
“Peasants are no better than straw. They will not hear the word and they are without sense; therefore they must be compelled to hear the crack of the whip and the whiz of bullets and it is only what they deserve.”
(ref. Erlangen Vol 24, Pg. 294).
“To kill a peasant is not murder; it is helping to extinguish the conflagration. Let there be no half measures! Crush them! Cut their throats! Transfix them. Leave no stone unturned! To kill a peasant is to destroy a mad dog!” – “If they say that I am very hard and merciless, mercy be damned.Let whoever can stab, strangle, and kill them like mad dogs”
(ref. Erlangen Vol 24, Pg. 294).
“Like the drivers of donkeys, who have to belabor the donkeys incessantly with rods and whips, or they will not obey, so must the ruler do with the people; they must drive, beat throttle, hang, burn, behead and torture, so as to make themselves feared and to keep the people in check.”
(ref. Erlangen Vol 15, Pg. 276).
“If the husband is unwilling, there is another who is; if the wife is unwilling, then let the maid come.”
(ref. Of Married Life).
“Suppose I should counsel the wife of an impotent man, with his consent, to give herself to another, say her husband’s brother, but to keep this marriage secret and to ascribe the children to the so-called putative father. The question is: Is such a women in a saved state? I answer, certainly.”
(ref. On Marriage).
“It is not in opposition to the Holy Scriptures for a man to have several wives.”
(ref. De Wette, Vol. 2, p. 459).
“The word and work of God is quite clear, viz., that women are made to be either wives or prostitutes.”
(ref. On Married Life).
“In spite of all the good I say of married life, I will not grant so much to nature as to admit that there is no sin in it. .. no conjugal due is ever rendered without sin. The matrimonial duty is never performed without sin.”
(ref. Weimar, Vol 8. Pg. 654. In other words for Luther the matrimonial act is “a sin differing in nothing from adultery and fornication.” ibid. What then is the purpose of marriage for Luther you may ask? Luther affirms that it’s simply to satisfy one’s sexual cravings “The body asks for a women and must have it” or again “To marry is a remedy for fornication” – Grisar, “Luther”, vol. iv, pg. 145).
“What harm could it do if a man told a good lusty lie in a worthy cause and for the sake of the Christian Churches?”
(ref. Lenz: Briefwechsel, Vol. 1. Pg. 373).
“To lie in a case of necessity or for convenience or in excuse – such lying would not be against God; He was ready to take such lies on Himself”
(ref. Lenz: Briefwechsel, Vol. 1. Pg. 375).
“St. Augustine or St. Ambrosius cannot be compared with me.”
(ref. Erlangen, Vol. 61, pg. 422).
“What I teach and write remains true even though the whole world should fall to pieces over it”
(ref. Weimar, Vol. 18, Pg. 401).
If you heard strains of Bergoglianism, Marxism, post-modern oligarchism, AND islam in these quotes, you were not imagining things. All of these “isms” have the same root – diabolical narcissism: the purging of all love from the self and the elevation of the self above all else including God – this is what Lucifer and the demons did, and this is what diabolical narcissists do. That’s why I made a video about it, and will be writing about it ad nauseam for the foreseeable future.
Now do you see why giving Holy Communion to the Lutherans in St. Peter’s Basilica was an explicit act of Eucharistic desecration?
Now do you see why this business of “celebrating” the Lutheran Revolt of ARSH 1517 is nothing short of satanic?
And to any Lutherans out there, if you genuinely love Jesus Christ, get the hell out of that cesspit of a sect. Find a traditional Catholic parish where the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (or Divine Liturgy) is offered and jump the Tiber – before it is too late.
Barnhardt Podcast #209: Pervs Playing with Dolls
In this episode, Art and Ann deconstruct the “Luce…fer” mascot of the 2025 Jubilee, including the word “mascot” itself. You’ll never look at the MLB San Diego Chicken the same way again. We then touch on politics in hopes of keeping people grounded in reality about all of the unsavory characters in the last episode before the 2024 “election.” Finally, we discuss the excellence of the three hour uninterrupted, unscripted podcast format for public figures and candidates, and even potential colleagues, friends or spouses. Would you hire someone, or marry someone, who couldn’t or wouldn’t answer questions or hold a train of thought?
https://www.etymonline.com/word/mascot
HELL: It’s So Much Worse Than You Think. Worse Than You Can Possibly Imagine.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/steve-bannon-jeffrey-epstein-spy-b1941122.html
Feedback: the email address for the podcast is [email protected].
The Infant Jesus of Prague handles Ann’s financial stuff. Click image for details. [If you have a recurring donation set up and need to cancel for whatever reason – don’t hesitate to do so!]
Public Service Post: Muffin tin-Tea candle cooktop. Why didn’t I think of that?
Greta, dat you??? 😂🤣
GREAT catch, here…
#Luce #synod pic.twitter.com/Figxl9AsaN
— Arcivescovo Carlo Maria Viganò (@CarloMVigano) October 29, 2024
Mascot of 2025 Jubilee is a blue-haired androgyne wearing a sodomy “Pride” rainbow Rosary as a necklace and carrying a witch’s stang, named “Luce.” Is that short for Lucifer? The answer is, “Almost certainly, yes.”
Remember the reportage here years ago about the Stang? Yeah.
A Stang is a witch/warlock’s ceremonial staff. It is always forked, and always has an iron nail driven through it. Ideally it has a human form carved or integrated into it somehow. The Stang signifies several things, the first being a satan himself. Read the quote below from a witchcraft blog:
“Gary describes the Stang as primarily a symbolic tool rather than a working one, and as such it stands in for the Devil himself, holding his power and his dual nature. The Devil and the Stang is often less about strict duality and more about the transgressing of boundaries, The Devil being a spirit I often think of as non-binary and difficult to define in terms of absolutes.”
That’s mild compared to this quote from the same article:
“The witch is bound to no dogma. This makes them a threat to a Christianity established on doctrine. The witch insists everything in creation has its place. The Church insisted on two contrary substances God and The Devil. The witch strives for synthesis.”
Nicholaj De Mattos Frisvold- Craft of The Untamed.
G.W.F. Hegel, please dial “666” on a white courtesy telephone….
Ugh they gave the blue-haired, non-binary, anime-faced, stang-wielding Thing a website 🤦🏻♀️https://t.co/NZhY8n8vLw pic.twitter.com/h1zs64wNRm
— NurseClaire (@NurseClaire2) October 28, 2024
Look where is says in the lower-right, “Designed by TokiDoki”.
TokiDoki, ‘dis you?