Remember, Lucifer rebelled against God because Lucifer wanted and thought he deserved to be the vector through which the Second Person of the Triune Godhead incarnated into the world. Put simply, Lucifer wanted to be what Mary is: the Co-Redeemer/Redemptrix and Queen of Heaven and Earth. It’s totally speculative, but he might have expected to be incarnated as a woman, having both an angelic nature and a human nature, and thus bear the Son of God.

But Lucifer was a prideful bitch, and still is, and it was never God’s plan that he be the Theotokos. So he went to war against God (sounds so familiar), and especially women.

The Pachamamabitch is satan in drag, mocking not just women but very specifically Our Lady of Guadalupe, whose apparition to St. Juan Diego was the immediate impetus of the conversion of more human beings to Jesus Christ and His One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church than any other single event in history SO FAR.

Remember, the Pachamamabitch is PREGNANT, and Our Lady of Guadalupe is the only Marian apparition in which Our Lady is pregnant. NonVeni Mark pointed this most salient fact out in Barnhardt Podcast #264.

This is why the satanist faggots in the Antichurch, led by Antipope Bergoglio and now Antipope “FtR” PERVost are all-in on the open enthronement and worship of the Pachamamabitch. This is why the satanist pedophile Tucho Fernandez farted out a document openly attacking the dignity of the Blessed Virgin Mary, declaring it “always inappropriate” to refer to her by her rightful titles of Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix of All Graces. The dogmatic definition of Mary as Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix of All Graces was, along with the condemnation of global communism, the ORIGINAL agenda of Vatican II until it was hijacked by German and American prelates on the morning of the second day of proceedings.

It is therefore truly odd to see prelates like Cardinal Burke, who has a deep devotion to Our Lady, particularly under her title of Our Lady of Guadalupe, so stridently defend the clearly, obviously hijacked and FAILED Second Vatican Council. Further, every day that passes in which St. Peter’s Basilica, where the Pachamamabitch was literally ritually enthroned in a public ceremony on October 18, ARSH 2019 by Antipope Bergoglio, is not formally, publicly, ritually reconciled after being thus publicly desecrated, is not merely scandalous, but NEFARIOUS, as stated in the 1917 Code of Canon Law. ***See citation below.

And so, we see by logical definition that the acknowledgement the both Bergoglio and PERVost are antipopes, AND that the Second Vatican Council was and obviously is a FAILED council, is deeply Marian, and inextricably tied to her and her Motherhood of Our Lord.

If only there were signs!

IF. ONLY. THERE. WERE. SIGNS.

Mary, Mother of God, pray for us.

Note that satan in drag as the Pachamamabitch, is depicted as pregnant.

Here’s the text of Canon Law from the 1911 Code. Emphases mine:

Canon 1173 (1983 CIC 1211) Cross-Ref.: 1917 CIC 2329
§ 1. A church is violated only by the below-listed acts, provided they are certain, notorious, and were placed inside the church:
1.° The delict of homicide;
2.° An injurious and grave flow of blood;
3.° Impious and sordid use to which the church was put;
4.° Burial of an infidel or an excommunicate after a declaratory or condemnatory
sentence;
§ 2. A violated church, but not the cemetery, even if it is contiguous, can be considered violated, and vice versa.
Canon 1173 (1983 CIC 1211)
§ 1. In a violated church, before it has been reconciled, it is nefarious to celebrate the divine office, to minister the Sacraments, or to bury the dead.
§ 2. If the violation occurs at the time of the divine office, these cease immediately; if [it was] before the canon of the Mass or after communion, Mass is dismissed; otherwise, the priest shall continue the Mass until communion.
Canon 1174 (NA)
§ 1. A violated church is to be reconciled as quickly as possible according to the rites described in the approved liturgical books.
§ 2. If there is doubt about whether a church has been violated, it can be reconciled as a precaution.

Note the words of the Canon, folks. It is NEFARIOUS to celebrate the Sacraments, of which the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is supreme, in a desecrated church until it has been reconciled. Note how churches are addressed in Canon Law and in the Ritual as personified, and thus a church is “reconciled” just as we are reconciled to God in the Sacrament of Confession.

“We must make our way towards eternity,
never regarding what men think of us,
or of our actions,
studying only to please God.” —St. Francis Borgia

Human respect, such an effeminate vice, is one of the principal characteristics of our dying world. Acedia, the vice of indifference is the other.

Most men don’t care, and don’t care that they don’t care, and the ones who DO care, care about the wrong thing: the esteem of men and the world. Human respect dictates their every word and deed.

St. Francis Borgia, pray for us.

“The writers of the Church tell us that in the latter days the city of Rome will probably become apostate from the Church and Vicar of Jesus Christ; and that Rome will again be punished, for he will depart from it; and the judgment of God will fall on the place from which he once reigned over the nations of the world. For what is it that makes Rome sacred, but the presence of the Vicar of Jesus Christ? What has it that should be dear in the sight of God, save only the presence of the Vicar of His Son ? Let the Church of Christ depart from Rome, and Rome will be no more in the eyes of God than Jerusalem of old. Jerusalem, the Holy City, chosen by God, was cast down and consumed by fire, because it crucified the Lord of Glory; and the city of Rome, which has been the seat of the Vicar of Jesus Christ for eighteen hundred years, if it become apostate, like Jerusalem of old, will suffer a like condemnation. And, therefore, the writers of the Church tell us that the city of Rome has no prerogative except only that the Vicar of Christ is there ; and if it become unfaithful, the same judgments which fell on Jerusalem, hallowed though it was by the presence of the Son of God, of the Master, and not the disciple only, shall fall likewise upon Rome.

The apostasy of the city of Rome from the Vicar of Christ, and its destruction by Antichrist, may be thoughts so new to many Catholics, that I think it well to recite the text of theologians in the greatest repute. First, Malvenda, who writes expressly on the subject, states as the opinion of Ribera, Gaspar Melus, Viegas, Suarez, Bellarmine, and Bosius, that Rome shall apostatise from the faith, drive away the Vicar of Christ, and return to its ancient paganism.* Malvenda’s words are: “But Rome itself in the last times of the world will return to its ancient idolatry, power, and imperial greatness. It will cast out its Pontiff, altogether apostatise from the Christian faith, terribly persecute the Church, shed the blood of martyrs more cruelly than ever, and will recover its former state of abundant wealth, or even greater than it had under its first rulers.”

Henry Edward Cardinal Manning, “The Present Crisis of the Holy See”, ARSH 1861, pg 87-88

Rome shall apostatise from the faith [check!], drive away the Vicar of Christ [check!], and return to its ancient paganism [check!].

Cardinal Manning nailed it. In a sane world, it will be Cardinal Manning, not John-Henry Newman who is actually canonized by a valid Pope.

The agents, bots and algorithms are busy today, folks!

EVERYTHING IS FAKE AND GAY.

I have no better way of knowing if a man is for God than if he likes to say the Hail Mary and the Rosary.

-Saint Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort

Truer words never spoken. Run, don’t walk, RUN from anyone who declares that they hate the Rosary. That’s an infiltrator and/or enemy of Jesus Christ and His Holy Church EVERY TIME.

“While the world changes, the Cross stands firm.”
-St. Bruno of Cologne

God does not change.  His law does not change. Objective moral norms do not change. Sodomy is a sin that cries out to heaven for God’s vengeance.  Every human being is born with this etched onto his heart – this is the Natural Law. Sodomy has always been a sin, is a sin now, and will always be a sin. Wretches like James Martin, now-dead Antipope Jorge Bergoglio, Tucho Fernandez, Antipope Robert “FtR” PERVost, and all the rest must acknowledge this before death, repent of their own lives of horrific sin, and of the scandal and murder of souls that they are and will be responsible for.

The man who causes scandal is a murderer. The man who allows himself to be scandalized commits suicide.

Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things {sodomy}, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.

Romans 1: 22-32

Vision of Saint Bruno. Sebastiano Ricci, ARSH 1705

Guess the saint:

This saint joined a Crusade to Egypt in the hopes of PROSELYTIZING as many musloids as he could before being killed.  This saint was not killed, but was instead received into the court of a sultan.  Our saint then offered to engage in a trial by fire – literal fire – with the sultan’s musloid “scholars”.  Our saint offered to enter into a fire pit and if he emerged unscathed, the musloid scholars would then have to concede that the CATHOLIC GOD (the word “catholic” means “universal”, so of course God is Catholic, and of course His Church is Catholic) and not the phoney musloid god (our saint, like any intelligent person, knows that the thing called “allah” is a non-existent pagan-Bedouin moon deity concocted by the inventors of the musloid political system, inspired by satan himself) is the One, True God.  Naturally, knowing that their non-existent deity could not duplicate such a miracle, and not wanting to be burned to a crisp, the musloids declined the challenge – BUT the sultan granted our saint permission to PROSELYTIZE and win souls for Christ in his territory WHILE THIS VERY SULTAN WAS FIGHTING CRUSADERS.

Who was this saint who knew that not only was PROSELYTIZING not “solemn nonsense”, but was utterly essential and demanded by Our Lord – a direct corollary to the two Great Commandments, to love God and to love our neighbor?

Yep.  It was St. Francis of Assisi.

Giotto’s fresco depicting St. Francis’ Trial by Fire. The musloids are on the left, slinking away. Apparently this was all a terrible mistake on St. Francis’ part. He should have merely “encountered” the musloids in a spirit of “dialogue” and “human fraternity”, and listened to their lies and then declared that they should all engage in good works and “meet each other there”. Because, you know, there isn’t a “Catholic God”, and the god the musloids believe in is the same as the Triune Godhead, or something. And God Himself being Goodness Itself, and good and evil being whatever the individual “conceives” them as being, “God” is whoever or whatever the individual says He, She or It is. Thank “god” we had Smart Antipope Fwancis and now his successor Antipope “FtR” PERVost today to correct all of the errors of Stupid Francis of Assisi.

For he hath given his angels charge over thee; to keep thee in all thy ways.
Quoniam angelis suis mandavit de te, ut custodiant te in omnibus viis tuis.

In their hands they shall bear thee up: lest thou dash thy foot against a stone.
In manibus portabunt te, ne forte offendas ad lapidem pedem tuum.
-Psalm 90: 11-12

I strongly suspect that we will all be mightily embarrassed when we are shown just how much our guardian angels have done for us, how many times they have saved our skins, how much they love us, and how little we acknowledged them. Make sure you acknowledge your guardian angel today, most especially.

“Sigamber” is a pejorative term akin to “barbarian”, referencing the Sicambrian race from which Clovis, King of the Franks, descended.

Clovis, king of all northern Gaul (France), was himself yet a pagan, though not unfriendly to the Church. He had married St. Clotildis, daughter of the Christian king of Burgundians, Chilperic, and she made repeated attempts to convert her husband. In 496, the Alemanni crossed the Rhine and the Franks marched out to drive them back. One account says that St. Clotildis had said to Clovis in taking leave, “My lord, to be victorious invoke the God of the Christians. If you call on Him with confidence, nothing can resist you”; and that the wary Clovis had promised that he would be a Christian if he were victorious. The battle was going badly against him when the king, either reminded of these words or moved by desperation, shouted to the heavens, “O Christ, Whom Clotildis invokes as Son of the Living God, I implore Thy help! I have called upon my gods, and they have no power. I therefore call on Thee. I believe in Thee! Deliver me from my enemies and I will be Baptized in Thy name!” The Franks rallied and turned the tide of battle; the Alemanni were overcome.

Queen St. Clotildis was not trusting to any enthusiasm of victory, and sent for St. Remigius, telling him to touch the heart of the king while he was well disposed. When Clovis saw her he cried out, “Clovis has vanquished the Alemanni and you have triumphed over Clovis. What you have so much at heart is done.” The queen answered, “To the God of hosts is the glory of both these triumphs due.” Clovis suggested that perhaps the people would not be willing to forsake their gods, but said he would speak to them according to the bishop’s instructions. He assembled the chiefs and warriors, but they prevented his speaking, and cried out, “We abjure mortal gods, and are ready to follow the immortal God whom Remigius preaches.” St. Remigius and St. Vedast therefore instructed and prepared them for Baptism. To strike the senses of barbarous people and impress their minds, Queen Clotildis took care that the streets from the palace to the church should be adorned with hangings, and that the church and baptistery should be lighted with a great number of candles and scented with incense. The catechumens marched in procession, carrying crosses, and singing the litany; St. Remigius conducted the king by the hand, followed by the queen and the people. At the font the bishop is said to have addressed Clovis in words that are memorable, if not actually pronounced: “Bow your gentle neck, Sigamber; adore what you have burned, burn what you have adored.” (Mitis depone colla, Sigamber; adora quod incendisti, incende quod adorasti.)” Words which may be emphatically addressed to every penitent, to express the change of heart and conduct that is required of him.

St. Remigius afterwards Baptized the king’s two sisters and three thousand men of his army, as well as women and children, with the help of the other bishops and priests present.

St. Remy, pray for us!

In the 6th century, Gregory of Tours reports that when Clovis I was baptised by Saint Remigius in 496 this bishop called Clovis a Sigamber, while referring to past barbarity:^[30]