Category Archives: Uncategorized

Good Morning, Eff Bee Eye!!!

Blessed are they that suffer persecution for justice’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Beati qui persecutionem patiuntur propter justitiam : quoniam ipsorum est regnum caelorum.

Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for My sake:
Beati estis cum maledixerint vobis, et persecuti vos fuerint, et dixerint omne malum adversum vos mentientes, propter me :

Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven. For so they persecuted the prophets that were before you.
Gaudete, et exsultate, quoniam merces vestra copiosa est in caelis. Sic enim persecuti sunt prophetas, qui fuerunt ante vos.

The Final Legal Word on Kermit the Hermit the Pfake Pfranciscan Pfriar and his “Conclave by Marriott”.

A doff of the top hat and a clink of the snifter to Mr. Brian Murphy out of California for sending these citations from the now-famous JPII document on Papal Conclaves from ARSH 1996, Universi Dominici Gregis.

UDG has become famous over the past ten years as arguments have been made that the Bergoglian Antipapacy is invalid due to shenanigans at the faux-conclave of March ARSH 2013. This is wrong, because the root of the problem is totally antecedent; namely Pope Benedict’s failed attempt to only partially resign the active governance of the Church while “remaining in a new way within the enclosure of St. Peter” two weeks before the fake conclave even happened.

So, in order for UDG, which specifically pertains to conclaves, to have been germane to the question of shenanigans inside of a conclave, there would have had to have been… you know… a legal, valid conclave in March ARSH 2013 to apply it to. And there wasn’t. It is ontologically and canonically impossible to have a valid conclave while the See is still occupied, which it was by Pope Benedict until he died on December 31, ARSH 2022, thirty-seven days ago as of this writing, whether he liked it or not.

HOWEVER, as Mr. Murphy points out, what UDG explicitly forbids is anything even remotely like the farcical fiasco that Kermit the Hermit, the fake Franciscan friar attempted last week. It had been so long since I had read UDG that the paragraphs about calling conclaves never clicked in my mind with regards to the “Conclave by Marriott” grift – which sadly, a few people have actually fallen for. Not many, but a handful. There were only FIVE lay people that showed up for the idiotic thing, but Kermit the Hermit is still trying to run a new grift off of it, and simple people (“marks” is what law enforcement calls the targeted victims of con artists) are being sucked into it.

Here are the paragraphs of UDG that totally shoot down any notion of laymen calling a conclave.

Paragraph 4: While the See is vacant, NO modifications to law, especially law governing conclaves, may be modified.

4. During the vacancy of the Apostolic See, laws issued by the Roman Pontiffs can in no way be corrected or modified, nor can anything be added or subtracted, nor a dispensation be given even from a part of them, especially with regard to the procedures governing the election of the Supreme Pontiff. Indeed, should anything be done or even attempted against this prescription, by my supreme authority I declare it null and void.

Paragraph 5: Messes have to be handled exclusively by the College of Cardinals.

5. Should doubts arise concerning the prescriptions contained in this Constitution, or concerning the manner of putting them into effect, I decree that all power of issuing a judgment in this regard belongs to the College of Cardinals, to which I grant the faculty of interpreting doubtful or controverted points. I also establish that should it be necessary to discuss these or other similar questions, except the act of election, it suffices that the majority of the Cardinals present should concur in the same opinion.

Paragraph 33: Laity are forbidden to be electors.

33. The right to elect the Roman Pontiff belongs exclusively to the Cardinals of Holy Roman Church, with the exception of those who have reached their eightieth birthday before the day of the Roman Pontiff’s death or the day when the Apostolic See becomes vacant. The maximum number of Cardinal electors must not exceed one hundred and twenty. The right of active election by any other ecclesiastical dignitary or the intervention of any lay power of whatsoever grade or order is absolutely excluded.

Final Paragraphs: All previous laws regarding conclaves are abrogated, and any conclave called in violation of the norms outlined in UDG is totally invalid.

PROMULGATION

Wherefore, after mature reflection and following the example of my Predecessors, I lay down and prescribe these norms and I order that no one shall presume to contest the present Constitution and anything contained herein for any reason whatsoever. This Constitution is to be completely observed by all, notwithstanding any disposition to the contrary, even if worthy of special mention. It is to be fully and integrally implemented and is to serve as a guide for all to whom it refers.

As determined above, I hereby declare abrogated all Constitutions and Orders issued in this regard by the Roman Pontiffs, and at the same time I declare completely null and void anything done by any person, whatever his authority, knowingly or unknowingly, in any way contrary to this Constitution.


Wow. It’s almost as if the Divine Providence in His perfection foresaw this unforeseeable mess, and even foresaw grifter nuts pulling stunts like calling fake conclaves. How truly awesome.

And that is the final word on Kermit the Hermit the Fake Franciscan Friar, and his “Conclave by Marriott” grift.

Deo gratias!

Antipope Bergoglio to fart out another totally invalid document on Holy Monday, just to try to ruin Easter, totally “banning” Ordinations, Baptisms, Confirmations, Weddings in the Roman Rite – Novus Ordo only!

Welp, the former Ecclesia Dei communities are going to have to make a choice: capitulate to Antipope Bergoglio, or lose most of their seminarians, big donors, and a good chunk of the faithful to the SSPX.

Frankly, I’m glad it’s coming to a head. I’m moving next month precisely so that none of this will affect me – as it turns out, just a few days before this Luciferian stagecraft is set to drop: April 3rd. Holy Monday.

And, it’s going to be labeled, falsely of course, an “Apostolic Constitution”, which is the highest ranking papal magisterial document, if it were being issued by an actual Pope instead of being farted by an Antipope who is probably the False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist.

Remember, every bit of power that Antipope Bergoglio has is what is freely given to him by the cowardice of men who should have called him out and removed him as the criminal usurper Antipope that he is. Antipope Bergoglio has zero REAL authority. All he has is deception and the cowardice of others. This is why I say that the greatest act of violence that can be done against the Papacy, divinely instituted by Christ Himself as a gift to His Holy Church, is to call a man “Peter” who is not Peter. And it seems we are all going to find out exactly how much it is going to take to get people to understand this simple and obvious truth.

Here is the link to the German blog, and the full algorithmic translation below.

http://summorum-pontificum.de/meldungen/weltkirche/2368-mehr-als-nur-geruechte-neues-aus-dem-sumpf.html

Our Roman source has spoken out with new information and clarifications about the awaited Apostolic Constitution to push traditional teaching and its rite out of the life of the Church.

According to this, the focus of the document is the express ban on administering the sacraments and sacramentals in the traditional form, as regulated in the traditional Roman ritual or the pontificale. Baptism, marriage, confirmation – only in the new rite and in Latin only insofar as they are performed in Latin within a celebration of the NO. Our source could not say to what extent a special permit is required for the latter, as is already the case in some US dioceses.

This ban also expressly applies to the ordination of deacons and priests – in the future, even in communities that are faithful to tradition, they may only take place according to the reform (Novus Ordo) liturgy. The administration of the sacramentals traditionally referred to as “minor consecrations” – for which there is no new rite – is prohibited.

The “freedom” of the priests of the traditional communities, celebrating Mass after the Traditional missal without special permission is restricted to use within the “canonically established” houses of these communities.

This current information, which apparently goes beyond the status of mere rumours, also names Holy Week as the publication date of the document – i.e. probably the anniversary of Paul VI’s Constitution Missale Romanum. on the 3rd of April.

The intentions of the new and undoubtedly “unconstitutional” legislation of the Bergoglio Pope (sic), which is specified here, are becoming increasingly clear: the traditional liturgy (and teaching, because that is what it is ultimately about) is to be made more and more invisible and pushed over the edge. Go over there! If possible, the “normal believer” should no longer come into contact with what has been Catholic for two thousand years – and if he does, then with the bad conscience of doing something “forbidden”. spiritual abuse at the highest level; the Pope (sic) as a murderer of souls?

The second target of the attack is the communities of tradition, which are to be attacked in their innermost being through the prohibition or strictest restriction of their pastoral work and in particular through the prohibition of consecration in the traditional rite. Its members are also to be forced to understand the two-thousand-year history of the Church of Christ as an outdated, even closed chapter, and to swear an oath of allegiance to the Church of the Zeitgeist, which was re-enlivened by the “spirit of Vatican II” and newly founded by the “Pistolero from the Pampas.” The concrete effects this will have on the seminarians and the young talent situation of the institutes should soon become apparent.

Two recent observations confirm the trend and justify the worst fears. For one, in a recent speech, the current “occupant” of the See of Peter said he had moral reservations about homosexuality. This earned him a reprimanding “Dubium” from his brother Jesuit James Martin. Francis (sic) answered this immediately, contrary to his usual dealings with dubia, and with a handwritten letter in which he diligently apologized and suggested a reading of his statements that was more agreeable to the “homo-Pope”.

The second is perhaps even more typical: With detailed decrees at the beginning of the month, Francis (sic) founded a more practically oriented “Laudato Si Education Center for ecological conversion” and a more theoretically working “Laudato Si Study Center for ecological reorientation”. Both institutions were endowed with extensive institutional and financial privileges and were assigned the summer papal residence of Castel-Gandolfo, used by previous popes, as premises for their undoubtedly extremely beneficial activities. Extensive renovation work is said to have already begun in this Borgo Laudato-Si, which is now to be called that.

Never was, is not, and never will be.

Patrick Coffin would like for me to assure you that he denounced Kermit the Hermit’s fake Marriott conclave, and knew something was very wrong when KtH went all-in for the Zelensky regime.

Patrick Coffin sends:


“While I did affirm [KtH’s] earlier work on the BiP evidence regarding the Declaratio (a lot of it was, in fact, helpful to me), I have had zero contact with him, no interviews, emails, nada, although I understand he posted some of my content on his website. In fact, I called him out for the retarded airport Marriott fiasco, pointed out his many contradictions, delusions of grandeur, and exposed him as a crank at best. He, or whomever is behind his “Remember Pope Benedict” Twitter account (the vulnerable man in Kansas?), blocked me after issuing his standard hyperbolic insults (absolute liar, a fool/knave etc etc.)

I didn’t know anything about his green habit background or the sketchy Lebanon fund raising, but his throwing money and attention at Ukraine was enough to alert me that something was seriously wrong. The Marriott airport BS is the cherry on top of a whole lot of crazy.”

This vomitous uptalking heterosexual (I assume?) faggot is a USAF Brigadier General. I seriously have no idea why the Chinese haven’t mounted a land invasion of CONUS yet. I’m not kidding.

And I will give children to be their princes, and the effeminate shall rule over them.

Et dabo pueros principes eorum, et effeminati dominabuntur eis;

Isaiah 3: 4

Mailbag: I conditionally baptized my miscarried child

Over the transom:


Dear Ann,

I wanted to thank you for sharing that information in your blog a while back regarding the truth concerning the death of unbaptised infants and going on into information about conditional baptism wherein the form changes slightly to “if you are able to be baptized, I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Som, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.”

My wife was 6 weeks pregnant. Bleeding started and looked to be more then more “spotting”, so she set an appointment with the ob/gyn in the afternoon of the next day. On that following day it wasn’t any better, maybe worse. Her ob/gyn encouraged her to go on into the ER, so she did. Ultrasound detected a faint heartbeat. They couldn’t exactly explain the bleeding–only that she would either miscarry or the baby will be carried to term, but they couldn’t do anything for her, so she came home.

Within 2 hours after coming home, she miscarried. “I think this is it,” she told me tearfully, having called me into the bathroom. I took our baby from her hands, who fit easily in one palm, so in the bathroom sink I administered conditional baptism.

So much is unknown. Baby had a faint heartbeat hours before in ultrasound and whether death occurred in utero and then my wife miscarried or whether the baby died almost immediately post miscarriage, there is only a slight chance that the soul was still present in the moment of baptism to save our child. I do not know and will not know in this life, but there comes much peace with the hope that our child may be with Jesus now because I had the presence of mind and knowledge how to administer conditional baptism thanks to the article you shared on your blog some time ago that covered this. So thank you for sharing this information. It really helped us make the most of a difficult situation.

I’ll mention reverent disposal of a miscarriage is a touchy subject, but there’s an organization called “A Mom’s Peace” that is good to be aware of. Closest location to us was just over 2 hours, but we couldn’t afford using a conventional funeral home. Tomb markers alone are north of $2000 at the LOW end of the price range. We found a monastery with a child cemetery using donated land and through the use of the nonprofit organization “A Mom’s Peace” everything from scheduling to finding a priest or deacon to perform the burial service is taken care of and they won’t turn you away if you can’t even afford to give that much. Even recommended donations only ran upwards of a few hundred dollars tops, but it was always stressed “just give what you can and we will take care of this for you.” This gave us much needed closure and a means to provide proper reverent disposal of human remains without “breaking the bank” to do so.

https://www.amomspeace.org