Author Archives: Ann Barnhardt

Proof of GreenFlag: New York Times, AP, Reuters and CNN were all literally embedded with the Hamas terrorists on 10/7.

So… the Powers That Be, the mainest of the Mainstream Media, and therefore also the Washington DC cabal, and therefore Tel Aviv knew. Dick Cheney, Lindsey Graham and John McCain’s ghost WILL have their nuclear war if they have to Lusitania the whole world to get it. Like I said. Evil, evil, evil. The whole mess. I won’t be tricked any longer into the whole “you HAAAAAVE to pick a SIIIIIDE” trap when both sides are observably evil.

The source link is getting hit so hard that it’s not opening as I write this, so here’s the AceOfSpades story. And remember, AoS is 1000% pro-Israel. It seems that they’re deluding themselves into believing that the NYT, AP, Reuters and CNN are all run by … musloids. Ummm… no. 🤦🏻‍♀️. Just no.

Remember Barnhardt Axiom #5: Nobody hates the Jews more than the Jews hate the Jews.

(cough, cough)


https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=406961

HonestReporting.com: NYT, CNN, Reuters, and AP Reporters Were Embedded With the Terrorist Killers of 10/7; Kept Silent About Coming Slaughter So That They Could Get Good Juicy Propaganda Pictures for Hamas

I don’t even know what to say.

On October 7, Hamas terrorists were not the only ones who documented the war crimes they had committed during their deadly rampage across southern Israel. Some of their atrocities were captured by Gaza-based photojournalists working for the Associated Press and Reuters news agencies whose early morning presence at the breached border area raises serious ethical questions.

What were they doing there so early on what would ordinarily have been a quiet Saturday morning? Was it coordinated with Hamas? Did the respectable wire services, which published their photos, approve of their presence inside enemy territory, together with the terrorist infiltrators? Did the photojournalists who freelance for other media, like CNN and The New York Times, notify these outlets?Judging from the pictures of lynching, kidnapping and storming of an Israeli kibbutz, it seems like the border has been breached not only physically, but also journalistically.

AP: Photojournalists or Infiltrators?

Four names appear on AP’s photo credits from the Israel-Gaza border area on October 7: Hassan Eslaiah, Yousef Masoud, Ali Mahmud, and Hatem Ali.
Eslaiah, a freelancer who also works for CNN, crossed into Israel, took photos of a burning Israeli tank, and then captured infiltrators entering Kibbutz Kfar Azza.

HonestReporting has obtained screenshots of Eslaiah’s now-removed tweets on X in which he documented himself standing in front of the Israeli tank. He did not wear a press vest or a helmet, and the Arabic caption of his tweet read: “Live from inside the Gaza Strip settlements.”

Masoud, who also works for The New York Times, was there as well — just in time to set foot in Israeli territory and take more tank pictures.

Ali Mahmud and Hatem Ali were positioned to get pictures of the horrific abductions of Israelis into Gaza.

Mahmud captured the pickup truck carrying the body of German-Israeli Shani Louk and Ali got several shots of abductees being kidnapped into the Strip.

Interestingly, the names of the photographers, which appear on other sources, have been removed from some of the photos on AP’s database. Perhaps someone at the agency realized it posed serious questions regarding their journalistic ethics.

More at the link.

If the link doesn’t work — it’s getting hit with massive traffic right now — you can try the archive.is link.

I think this means that the NYT, CNN, AP, and Reuters have photographic proof of the war crimes committed by their compatriots — but are hiding that proof because Hamas wants it hidden.



I’m no Trump fan, but I do believe that his six-word answer a few months back when the MSM bimbette tried to run that game on him with the Russia-Ukraine mess was possibly the best political answer of the 21st century so far: “I want people to stop DYING.” That answer is the exact opposite of the Military Industrial Combine’s and NewWorldOrder’s shared agenda. That’s the sort of statement that gets people assassinated.

(Re)Conquering Kingdoms and putting God’s enemies to flight. Let’s start with the Vatican, shall we?

Today is the Feast of the Four Holy Crowned Martyrs, four soldiers who were executed by being beaten to death for refusing to offer sacrifice to a pagan god by Diocletian in ARSH 304.  This is the Epistle Reading of their Mass today from Hebrews 11.  In addition to being justification for those of us accused of writing excessively long sentences, it makes the point that if you have Faith and do the right thing, you will win either way.  You will either subdue kingdoms and put the enemies of God to flight, or you will win the crown of martyrdom, depending on what the Will of God happens to be.

THE ULTIMATE WIN-WIN SCENARIO.

Please note that cowering sycophancy or even merely “keeping ones head down” are NOT viable options.  Fight and reign gloriously, or die gloriously.  But fight for Christ the King and His Holy Church.

[The Saints] who by faith conquered kingdoms, wrought justice, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, quenched the violence of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, recovered strength from weakness, became valiant in battle, put to flight the armies of foreigners:  women received their dead raised to life again: but others were racked, not accepting deliverance, that they might find a better resurrection; and others had trial of mockeries and stripes, moreover also of bands and prisons: they were stoned, they were cut asunder, they were tempted, they were put to death by the sword, they wandered about in sheepskins, in goatskins, being in want, distressed, afflicted: of whom the world was not worthy; wandering in deserts, in mountains, and in dens, and in caves of the earth. And all these being approved by the testimony of faith, In Christ Jesus Our Lord.

The Scourging of the Four Crowned Holy Martyrs, Niccolò di Pietro Gerini, Florence, ARSH 1385-1390

Updated: THE VISIBILITY OF THE BERGOGLIAN ANTIPAPACY: The most wonderful workings of The Divine Providence

Yes, the Bergoglian Antichurch is a cabal of slack-jawed, mouth-breathing malignant imbeciles… and the Divine Providence (Who has QUITE a sense of humor, it must be said) uses that in order to make manifest the fact that Whore-hay is not, never has been, and never will be the Pontifex Maximus. See the Part 3 video if you’re not up to speed.

Visibility, visibility, visibility. All day, every day.

https://www.gloria.tv/post/qxy3PyxZSWiY2ZnaBZW9JZnis


An epigraph on a new installation in the Roman Basilica Santa Maria Maggiore, in front of the high altar, contains an embarrassing error.

On the left is a white cathedra standing on three steps. On the second step is engraved “Franciscus” in Latin, followed by “P.M.A.X.”

These abbreviations make no sense. The correct version would be “Pont. Max.” or “P.M.” for Pontifex Maximus (Supreme Pontiff).

Giovanni Maria Vian, a former editor of L’Osservatore Romano, calls this “yet another manifestation of an undeniable decline of artistic patronage, but more generally of the cultural level, in the Catholic Church” (EditorialeDomani.it, October 21).

“I say, that boy’s about as sharp as a sack of WET MICE.”

The point here, in this absolutely staggeringly STUPID unforced error, is that we have yet ANOTHER example of the Divine Providence making sure that the enemies of Jesus Christ and His Holy Church, even coming from a place of abject stupidity, unwittingly state themselves that Jorge Bergoglio ain’t the Pontifex Maximus, but rather whatever “P.M.A.X.” stands for. Since there is no such extant acronym, let’s make one up.

Pedophilic Molestation Accomplice: X-rated

That’s my contribution. What is your acronym for Jorge Bergoglio: P.M.A.X.?

UPDATE: Ding ding ding, we have a winner!

Put Mildly: Ass Xtraordinaire.

Even the stones (and marble slabs) will cry out…

The Saturday Night Live reversion files. Today Rob Schneider, next… DENNIS MILLER.

Only serious Elvisphiles appreciated this SNL skit, but I’ve used “Tell Joe Esposito to bring the car around” as a colloquialism for “let’s bounce” in select company for thirty years now.

I’m really glad to hear that Rob Schneider has reverted to the one true faith. His Filipino mother’s side’s prayers worked. Next up, Pittsburgh Catholic boy, Dennis Miller. And don’t forget the Barnhardt Podcast family’s intention for the Podfather, co-Host of the No Agenda Podcast, the lion-maned original MTV VeeJay, Adam Curry. AC has publicly announced that he now professes Christianity, but we need to get him all-in. Full TLM. Saint Tiny Princess, pray for us!

For any Elvis-philes, here’s Rob Schneider, in the powder blue leisure jacket, in the “Tiny Elvis” skit from the early 90s, satirizing Elvis and The Memphis Mafia. Schneider is depicting Sonny West. Kevin Nealon is Red West, Elvis’ bodyguard and Sonny’s cousin, and Chris Farley is Elvis’ driver, Joe Esposito. Hence, ‘tell Joe Esposito to bring the car around’.

Below that is Elvis’ first big single, “Mystery Train” from August of ’55. Pure timeless Rockabilly quality.

Dat’s yuuuuuuuge!

Silly, clean fun.

NonVeni Mark sums it up in 80 words.

The following is the conclusion of NonVeni Mark’s crosspost of the Part 3 video.

As you examine the evidence, keep in mind the following axiom: Pope Benedict, in his act of resignation, needed to fully assent with his will to the total renunciation of the papacy in toto in order for it to be valid. If you find evidence, spoken, written, and visual evidence, that he did NOT intend to fully resign, that, on the contrary, he quite obviously intended to remain in some way papal, well then you have your answer. SUBSTANTIAL ERROR. -nvp

I’m in my Prime.

Yes, it is the Vigil of the Feast of Saints Simon and Jude once again, this year marking my 47th year. People in my gene pool have had the habit of dying at age 94, so I consider this my “mid-way point” of expected natural longevity. So, no more messing around. I better get with it!

And since I’m a math nerd, and 47 is a prime number, AND I’m of the considered opinion that Val Kilmer’s performance as Doc Holliday in Tombstone is one of the greatest things ever put on film, if you ask me if I FEEL middle-aged, I shall for the next year respond with the perfectly honest double entendres Hollidayism, “Not me, I’m in my prime.”

And, as is now a TWENTY year birthday tradition here on the Barnhardt.biz blog, please enjoy Alison Krauss and the Cox Family singing “Will There Be Any Stars In My Crown.”

Thanks to one and all for your kind greetings and good prayers, and to Our Loving and Merciful Lord for another incredibly wonderful year. I can’t wait to see what’s in store for orbital lap #48!

I am thinking today of that beautiful land
We shall reach when the sun goeth down
When through wonderful grace by my Saviour I stand
Will there be any stars in my crown?
Will there be any stars, any stars in my crown
When at evening the sun goeth down?
When I wake with the blest in those mansions of rest
Will there be any stars in my crown?
In the strength of the Lord let me labor and pray
Let me watch as a winner of souls

That bright stars may be mine in that glorious day
When His praise like the sea billow rolls.
Oh, what joy it will be when His face I behold
Living gems at His feet to lay down
It would sweeten my bliss in the city of gold
Should there be any stars in my crown.

December 9th: Is the Pope Catholic? A Free Conference Seeking the Truth about the ‘Two Popes’. Speakers include +Viganò, Fr. Altman, Fr. Kramer, Dr. Mazza, Liz Yore and Ann Barnhardt

Archbishop Vigano to Speak at Online Conference!!!

“Is the Pope Catholic?”

A Conference Seeking the Truth about the “Two Popes”

Saturday December 9, 2023

Featuring:

His Excellency Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò

Fr. James Altman

Fr. Paul Kramer

Dr. Ed Mazza

Elizabeth Yore

Ann Barnhardt

To REGISTER please email: [email protected]

On February 11, 2013, two tremendous bolts of lightening struck the Dome of St. Peter’s Basilica, directly above the Tomb of the Apostle–the same day Pope Benedict announced his stunning Declaratio! Stranger still, in the Vatican, for the next decade, two men wore the signature white cassock, two men bestowed their own personal Apostolic Blessings on the faithful and two men were formally addressed as “His Holiness.” One resided in seclusion and self-imposed silence, in prayer and meditation at the Mater Ecclesiae Monastery in the Vatican Gardens. The other still resides in the Domus Sanctae Marthae, the Vatican hotel, which was built to house visiting cardinals. (Curiously, the Papal Apartments located in the Apostolic Palace since the 17th Century remain uninhabited.) The unexpected renunciation of Benedict and his perplexing presence in the Vatican as “Pope Emeritus” still confounds Catholics as much as–in some sense, even more than–the globalism and heterodoxy of the putative pope, Francis.

Now that the new “Synodal” Church is being foisted upon us, it’s time to seek the truth about the “two Popes.” It’s time for the silent majority to speak out. As conference speaker, His Excellency Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano has prophetically intoned:

Among the titles of the Roman Pontiff recurs, along with
Christi Vicarius, that of Servus servorum Dei [“Servant of the
servants of God”]. While the former has been disdainfully
rejected by Bergoglio, his choice to retain the latter sounds
like a provocation, as evidenced by his words and deeds.
The day will come when the Presuli of the Church will be
asked to clarify what intrigues and what conspiracies could
have led to the Throne him who acts as “Servant of Satan’s
servants,” and why they have fearfully witnessed his
intemperances or made themselves accomplices of this
proud heretical tyrant. Let those who know and who keep
silent out of false prudence tremble: by their silence they do
not protect the honor of the Holy Church, nor do they
preserve the simple ones from scandal. On the contrary,
they plunge the Bride of the Lamb into ignominy and
humiliation, and turn the faithful away from the Ark of
salvation at the very moment of the Flood.

Various speakers at “Is the Pope Catholic?” Conference will consider the possibility of 1) the invalidity of Pope Benedict’s resignation, or 2) the invalidity of Bergoglio’s acceptance of the Papacy, or 3) Bergoglio’s loss of office due to public material (if not formal) heresy.

Code of Canon Law of the Catholic Church, Canon 748 §1. “All persons are bound to seek the truth in those things which regard God and his Church…are bound by the obligation…of embracing and observing the truth which they have come to know.”

Fr. Franz Wernz and Fr. Pedro Vidal’s Ius Canonicum, an eight-volume work published in 1943, which is perhaps the most highly respected commentary on the 1917 Code of Canon Law, states:

“Finally they cannot be numbered among the schismatics, who refuse to obey the Roman Pontiff because they consider his person to be suspect or doubtfully elected on account of rumors in circulation.”