In the year ARSH 1240, the beautiful Italian noblewoman Clare of Assisi who had become a nun after hearing St. Francis preach, saved her convent and all the sisters therein from a massive hoard of musloid invaders – mercenaries from then-musloid Sicily paid by Emperor Frederick II to exert his control over the Italian peninsula. How did she do it? With the musloids putting ladders against the walls of the convent preparing to enter and… do what musloids do to women – can you imagine the abject terror the dear sisters and Clare must have felt? – brave Clare went to Our Lord and placed Him in a monstrance and then carried Him herself out to the walls, where she placed Him in view of the musloid mercenaries. Clare and the sisters then fell down prostrate before Our Lord Jesus Christ, physically, substantially present in the Holy Eucharist, and prayed. At this sight, a wave of fear crashed over the musloids and they dropped everything, turned, and fled. The sisters and Assisi were saved. It was a miracle.
St. Clare of Assisi, repeller of musloid hordes, pray for us.
This is a good step. People will cite +Vigano’s fake “excommunication” from the Bergoglian Antichurch as discrediting him, but I think at this point faithful Catholics who aren’t financially dependent upon remaining in the public “good graces” of the institutional Antichurch and are thus blinded by their own unwillingness to suffer, know perfectly well that Antipope Bergoglio and Touchme Fagnandez have as much genuine authority in the Catholic Church as Kim and Khloe Kardashian. In fact, I’m still seriously awaiting my own “official” Antichurch document of “excommunication”. I would frame it and carry it up to the Communion Rail with me every time I made a Sacramental Communion to show to Our Lord. 😇
+Vigano makes several excellent points in this statement.:
-A holy Pope would/will declare Vatican II a failed council and declare it null
-A holy Pope would/will abrogate the Novus Ordo Mass, obviously
-The Third Secret almost certainly regards a “bad council and bad Mass”. Again, pretty obvious.
-+Viganò calls out the SSPX for their sloth and effeminacy for playing nicey-nice with the Bergoglian Antichurch. Hear hear!
-Viganò rightly shoots down 1958 Sedevacantism, and then uses a turn of phrase which I REALLY like and will use myself: “Even if it is appropriate to suspend … judgment on the popes of the Council, it is necessary to put everything that they have produced ‘in parenthesis’ so to speak,”
That’s exactly right. Everything in this past Vatican II/Novus Ordo/Bergogkian Antipapacy epoch will obviously all go “in parentheses” for all of history. It’s clearly a state of emergency exception.
Do click over and read/watch the whole thing.
And shout-out to Dr. Mazza, NonVeniMark, and all of the other people of good will who have been beating this drum for going on a decade now. This is no time to back off. Quite the opposite. We must lean FORWARD into this momentum. We must never let up, because as I’m sure you’ve noticed, evil never lets up, never relents. We must match and exceed evil’s effort until evil is completely crushed under Our Lady’s heel.
If you’re interested, I have three videos on the Bergoglian Antipapacy: Part 1 (ARSH 2018), Part 2 (ARSH 2019), and Part 3 (ARSH 2023). My Bergoglian Antipapacy page with links and timestamps is HERE. And here’s my Part 3 video from last year, which is a stand-alone presentation for those just getting up to speed on how the Bergoglian Antipapacy happened in the first place back in February-March of ARSH 2013.
As always, I hope this helps.
Pray for the Petrine See, vacant these 588 days and counting, and for the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, outside of which there is no salvation.
St. Lawrence, St. Matthew, St. Andrew, St. Peter, Our Lady of Copacabana, pray for us!
I’ll start a list. If you think of any other examples of television families in which one or both parents were “inexplicably sterile” in the ’50s and ’60s, let me know.
Leave It to Beaver: Cleavers, 2. Rutherfords, 2. Haskells, 1. Mondellos, 4 (miserable/abusive household).
Dick Van Dyke Show, Petries, 1. Helpers, 1.
Ozzie and Harriet, 2.
Andy Griffith Show, 1 *father a widower.
Donna Reed, 2.
I Love Lucy, 1.
My Three Sons, 3 *father a widower.
Happy Days, 3.
Beverly Hillbillies, Clampetts, 1 *father a widower. Bodines, 2 (Twins) *mother a widow
Father Knows Best, 3.
Make Room For Daddy, 3 (blended).
The Brady Bunch, 6 (blended), remarried widow and widower produce no children together
Dennis the Menace, 1.
The Munsters, 1.
The Addams Family, 2.
The Patty Duke Show, 2, plus 1 identical cousin.
Bewitched, 2.
The Flintstones, 1 Flintstone, 1 Rubble.
Jetsons, 2.
Honeymooners, 0. (Dr. Mazza says Jackie Gleason set it up thusly because parents arguing in front of their children wasn’t acceptable back then.)
Anyone who isn’t a “bread and circuses useful idiot”, of which there are literally *tens of dozens* of us in Western Civilization by my reckoning, now knows that islam is a totalitarian political system that has nothing to do with “the life of the world to come” or the worshipping of and loving relationship with any deity, much less the One True Deity, but rather with global territorial conquest and the resulting dual-caste totalitarian political regime that rules every aspect of every life under its evil iron fist.
One of the things that you hear from musloid lovers and musloids themselves is that violent territorial conquest has also been the modus operandi of Christendom, specifically the Spanish conquest of the Americas. Here’s a bit of history that the Marxist education system has completely edited out of the book.
I, along with the reader who sent this to me, had always assumed that the family of the Aztec Emperor Montezuma was killed by the Spanish, namely Hernan Cortes, in order to keep the Aztecs from rallying to them and trying to re-establish the Aztec throne with his children. Montezuma did die, but it is unclear HOW he died. Admittedly, Cortes may have had him killed, but there are also accounts of Montezuma being stoned to death by his own people AND accounts of Montezuma starving himself to death. We just don’t know.
What we do know for a metaphysical certitude is what happened to Montezuma’s children – and brace yourself because this is going to be a shocker. They all converted to Christianity, and were quickly created titular Spanish royalty by the King of Spain. Not only were Montezuma’s children and grandchildren not killed, but they were recognized and respected as royalty and integrated into the Spanish Royal caste as Dukes, Duchesses, Counts and Countesses. They then relocated to Spain and married other Spanish royalty, and their lines and titular houses exist to this day, with those houses receiving pensions all the way up until ARSH 1934.
The crest of the House of Moctezuma.
What this shows is the amazing respect that the Spanish had for the people that they encountered in the Americas, DESPITE the horrific pagan atrocities that the Spanish encountered. The Spanish must have been utterly revolted at what they found in the Aztec culture, but STILL RECOGNIZED THE HUMANITY of the Aztecs. And yes, I do attribute this to the fact that the Spanish were working under the auspices of the Church, and the most important aspect their mission was to spread the Gospel to the peoples of the Americas. They didn’t view the Aztecs as sub-human. They viewed them as a pagan people that Christ Himself longed to have integrated into His Body. And you know what? MISSION. ACCOMPLISHED.
I am always shocked by how many Christians, falling for the Marxist propaganda of the last 50 years, LAMENT that the Latin American pagan cultures were converted to Christianity. This betrays the fact that most modern Christians really don’t believe in Christ or the Gospel deep down. How could a believing Christian LAMENT souls entering the Body of Christ? Furthermore, look at the Aztec, Maya and Inca cultures themselves. They were absolutely horrific. The amount of human sacrifice was massive. Life-or-death sporting events were also very common. Are we really so brainwashed by Marxist propaganda that we believe that the world would be a better place if such horrors were never exterminated and continued to this day – because ANYTHING is better than Christianity? Really? Every Christian should regularly offer prayers of Thanksgiving to Our Lord for the conversion of Latin America, the joy of many millions of people coming to know Christ and hear the Gospel, and for the extermination of the horrific, terrifying culture of human sacrifice that was swept away – may it never, ever return.
Oh… wait.
I know. Quit obsessing.
Now compare this to islam. Do you honestly believe that when the muslims fully overthrow England, for example, that they will honor the royal family? No, they will slaughter them like animals. Beyond that, the koran specifically states that some “infidels” may be allowed to live IF they pay the jizya tax of submission and live as third-class citizens, with muslims having full rape rights of the infidel women and children.
There is absolutely no comparison, and don’t let either a Marxist or a musloid trick you into believing otherwise.
Longtime readers of this space know well of my secular devotion to The Everly Brothers.
I’ve also been struck by the lovely and voluminous emails after any “hearing theological truths in ‘pop’ music’ posts.”I agree.
There is something special about realizing that the Divine Providence and the Divine Bridegroom finds His way into our lives, hearts and experiences even outside the Holy Liturgy.
He does not lock Himself inside His house like a misanthrope psycho cat lady. He is so in love with us as individuals that He manifests to us, low-key, in our daily lives. He is always peeking around the corner, that we might notice Him. Remember well what He said to St. Teresa of Avila, and realize that this applies to every human being EVER CONCEIVED.
“I wouldcreate the universe again just to hear you say that you love Me.”
Folks, that isn’thyperbole. He means it. This is why possibly the highest and best prayer is “I love you, Jesus.” “Jesus, mercy” and, “Have mercy on me, O Lord, a sinner” are also essential all-day-every-day prayers. But the reason He created the universe (which the Hubble and James Webb telescopes keep demonstrating to us in knee-collapsing detail) is just so that YOU, individually, JUST YOU, could say, “I love You, Lord Jesus.”
God-hating apostates claim that this is ‘cultish’, that God is ‘needy’, and those especially far-gone into the abyss of lovelessness and narcissism think this is proof that God is therefore evil. What they totally fail to comprehend is that God is INFINITE and therefore is outside all human categories. When The Second Person of the Triune Godhead Himself says, “I AM the Way, the Truth, and the Life,” it is because He can’t say anything else, because HE IS. You cannot apply the same standards or calculi to God that you apply to ANY man. Infinite Love requires a different metric, obviously.
When God, Infinite Love, says, “You have to love Me in order to be saved and be with Me forever in heaven (which is nothing less than in-dwelling in Me),” this applies in a way that DOES NOT APPLY to ANYONE else. Because He is God. This, it seems to me, is literally a few MINUTES of contemplation of the Triune Godhead, but so many miss it utterly and completely. They conflate men with God. If you’re in love, you could never mistake the one you love for anyone else, much less some random sodomite criminal apostate. Or even a GOOD priest!
When Infinite Love says that He loves the relative gnat, the gnat should listen, listen well, and believe. Because there is no incentive for the Infinite to lie or manipulate the gnat. The only POSSIBLE explanation is infinite, gratuitous LOVE. To reject this is… Luciferian. In the purest sense.
This is why I harp and harp, SCREECH even, about the absolute necessity of a PERSONAL relationship with Jesus Christ and, therefore, with His Bride, the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, outside of which there is no salvation. And, obviously, this is why we love His Vicar on Earth, the Vicar of Christ, and why we fight and defend that Office, and its authority and jurisdiction – especially against SUBSTANTIAL ERROR in a juridical matter by the Holy Father himself. Especially. Because we are all living the catastrophic fallout of such error.
Well. That was a tangent. All from… The Everly Brothers? Absolutely.
Here is “Walk Right Back”, which I have always heard as God calling us to repentance, confession and most especially to THE EUCHARIST. To this day, when I approach the Communion Rail, after being shriven and appropriately fasting and preparing per my state in life, I hear this as I walk up the aisle of the nave, Our Eucharistic Lord, speaking to me.
Shut up. I ain’t cryin’. You cryin’.
I want you to tell Me why you walked out on Me
I’m so lonesome every day
I want you to know that since you walked out on Me
Nothin’ seems to be the same old way
Think about the love that burns within My Heart for you
The good times we had before you went away, oh Me
Walk right back to Me this minute
Bring your love to Me, don’t send it
I’m so lonesome every day
I want you to tell Me why you walked out on Me
I’m so lonesome every day
I want you to know that since you walked out on Me
Nothin’ seems to be the same old way
Think about the love that burns within My Heart for you
The good times we had before you went away, oh Me
Walk right back to Me this minute
Bring your love to Me, don’t send it
I’m so lonesome every day
I’m so lonesome every day
I’m so lonesome every day
Shut you cryin’. Y’all cryin’. I ain’t cryin’. You know you cryin’.
Go to confession.
Tell Him that you love Him, then go outside tonight, look up at the stars and know that’s it’s ALL for you, and all ever was for you. So that you could know Him and love Him. And then know, however how, that He incarnated, suffered, and died for you.
It’s funny- I watch so many video clips – Cosmology, Astrophysics, Joe Rogan desperately trying to answer his own questions; and the root answer is always exactly the same:
You cannot begin to understand ANYTHING until you realize that the answer to every question is… LOVE.
What holds every electron in the universe in its valence shell? LOVE
Why is Pi everywhere in the physical universe? LOVE.
Why are we made as we are? LOVE.
Why was I born to my parents, no matter how shitty they might have been? LOVE.
Why does my suffering persist if I’m ready to die? LOVE.
Why aren’t my (stupid and pious) prayers answered? LOVE.
What am I even chasing? What is the Beatific Vision? LOVE HIMSELF. Not a taste, not a mere encounter. Heaven is existence INSIDE the Holy Trinity, experiencing everything, everyone, every sweetness in Itself. Omne delectamentum in se habentem.
If you come up on a question about the One True Faith, ask yourself, “Is the core answer to this question… Love?”
Joe Rogan could tie up about three dozen open ends of scientific inquiry if he would just acknowledge the terrifying reality that he is loved beyond his comprehension by the Creator/Sustainer of the universe who incarnated and died for him.
THAT is the 42 answer. To everything. LOVE. Not the hippy sentiment, but the real, diamond-edged grinder pain-to-gain situation.
It almost always is. Including, why does God allow… X… Y… Z??? The failure to address and divinize human suffering through the Cross of Christ is 90+% of the moral/cultural problem.
We’ve lost the capacity to suffer meritoriously for the sake of LOVE. True love, charity. Not lust or bullshit girlish fantasies of the satanic zeitgeist.
Transfiguration of Christ, Paolo Veronese, ARSH 1555-56, Cathedral of Santa Maria, Montagnana
This is paragraph 15 from “Sermon on the Transfiguration of our Lord and God and Savior, Jesus Christ” by St. Ephraim the Syrian. It seems to me that a simple verbatim recitation of this would make a spectacular sermon or homily by itself, Fathers.
“The facts themselves bear witness and His divine acts of power teach those who doubt that He is true God, and His sufferings show that He is true man. And if those who are feeble in understanding are not fully assured, they will pay the penalty on His dread day.
If He were not flesh, why was Mary introduced at all? And if He were not God, whom was Gabriel calling Lord?
If He were not flesh, who was lying in the manger? And if He were not God, whom did the Angels come down and glorify?
If He were not flesh, who was wrapped in swaddling clothes? And if He were not God, whom did the shepherds worship?
If He were not flesh, whom did Joseph circumcise? And if He were not God, in whose honor did the star speed through the heavens?
If He were not flesh, whom did Mary suckle? And if He were not God, to whom did the Magi offer gifts?
If He were not flesh, whom did Simeon carry in his arms? And if He were not God, to whom did he say, “Let me depart in peace”?
If He were not flesh, whom did Joseph take and flee into Egypt? And if He were not God, in whom were words “Out of Egypt I have called My Son” fulfilled?
If He were not flesh, whom did John baptize? And if He were not God, to whom did the Father from heaven say, “This is My beloved Son, in Whom I am well-pleased”?
If He were not flesh, who fasted and hungered in the desert? And if He were not God, whom did the Angels come down and serve?
If He were not flesh, who was invited to the wedding in Cana of Galilee? And if He were not God, who turned the water into wine?
If He were not flesh, in whose hands were the loaves? And if He were not God, who satisfied crowds and thousands in the desert, not counting women and children, from five loaves and two fishes?
If He were not flesh, who fell asleep in the boat? And if He were not God, who rebuked the winds and the sea?
If He were not flesh, with whom did Simon the Pharisee eat? And if He were not God, who pardoned the offenses of the sinful woman?
If He were not flesh, who sat by the well, worn out by the journey? And if He were not God, who gave living water to the woman of Samaria and reprehended her because she had had five husbands?
If He were not flesh, who wore human garments? And if He were not God, who did acts of power and wonders?
If He were not flesh, who spat on the ground and made clay? And if He were not God, who through the clay compelled the eyes to see?
If He were not flesh, who wept at Lazarus’ grave? And if He were not God, who by His command brought out one four days dead?
If He were not flesh, who sat on the foal? And if He were not God, whom did the crowds go out to meet with glory?
If He were not flesh, whom did the Jews arrest? And if He were not God, who gave an order to the earth and threw them onto their faces?
If He were not flesh, who was struck with a blow? And if He were not God, who cured the ear that had been cut off by Peter and restored it to its place?
If He were not flesh, who received spittings on His face? And if He were not God, who breathed the Holy Spirit into the faces of His Apostles?
If He were not flesh, who stood before Pilate at the judgement seat? And if He were not God, who made Pilate’s wife afraid by a dream?
If He were not flesh, whose garments did the soldiers strip off and divide? And if He were not God, how was the sun darkened at the cross?
If He were not flesh, who was hung on the cross? And if He were not God, who shook the earth from its foundations?
If He were not flesh, whose hands and feet were transfixed by nails? And if He were not God, how was the veil of the temple rent, the rocks broken and the graves opened?
If He were not flesh, who cried out, “My God, my God, why have you abandoned Me”? And if He were not God, who said “Father, forgive them”?
If He were not flesh, who was hung on a cross with the thieves? And if He were not God, how did He say to the thief, “Today you will be with Me in Paradise”?
If He were not flesh, to whom did they offer vinegar and gall? And if He were not God, on hearing whose voice did Hades tremble?
If He were not flesh, whose side did the lance pierce, and blood and water came out? And if He were not God, who smashed to gates of Hades and tear apart it bonds? And at whose command did the imprisoned dead come out?
If He were not flesh, whom did the Apostles see in the upper room? And if He were not God, how did He enter when the doors were shut?
If He were not flesh, the marks of the nails and the lance in whose hands and side did Thomas handle? And if He were not God, to whom did He cry out, “My Lord and my God”?
If He were not flesh, who ate by the sea of Tiberias? And if He were not God, at whose command was the net filled?
If He were not flesh, whom did the Apostles and Angels see being taken up into heaven? And if He were not God, to whom was heaven opened, whom did the Powers worship in fear and whom did the Father invite to “Sit at my right hand”. As David said, “The Lord said to my Lord, sit at my right hand, etc.”
If He were not God and man, our salvation is a lie, and the words of the Prophets are lies.”
(For your Sunday edification and recreation, an absolutely brilliant satire piece that burns to ash the abject nonsense argument that “we can’t know that Bergoglio is an Antipope”. I came across this in the commbox over at NonVeniMark’s place, HERE. Really, read the whole, delicious thing, including the “advertisement” for “Catastrophe Magazine” (aka Crisis) and Galatians 3:1, G3:1 (aka 1Peter5). Here’s G3:1… it’s PERFECT:
O senseless Galatians, who hath bewitched you that you should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been set forth, crucified among you? O insensati Galatae, quis vos fascinavit non obedire veritati, ante quorum oculos Jesus Christus praescriptus est, in vobis crucifixus?
Here’s just a nibble, but you must read the whole thing. And share.
Pope Susan (born Karen McNuggets), after the conclave of 2047.
Contextual Introduction
It is the year 2051 CE.
Karen McNuggets was elected to the See of Rome a few years ago, and took the name ‘Pope Susan.’ Since then, Pope Susan has begun radically changing everything in the Church.
Some were dismayed by this turn of events, and began promoting a horrible conspiracy theory – that Susan is a woman, and therefore not the Pope.
They refer to texts such as that of Caesar Badii, 1921 commentary on the Code of Canon Law:
‘The law now in force for the election of the Roman Pontiff is reduced to these points:…
‘Barred as incapable of being validly elected are the following: women, children who have not reached the age of reason, those suffering from habitual insanity, the unbaptized, heretics and schismatics.’1 (Emphasis added)
However, some of the most faithful conservative Catholics, wishing to return to the balanced and moderate principles laid out by Pope St Francis the Great, have taken great scandal and anxiety at the presumption of such claims – which have come to be known as Susanvacantism.
These faithful (and moderate) conservatives feel that Susanvacantism is dangerous, and that it is their duty to warn their fellow Catholics.
One such faithful and moderate (and balanced) conservative is Fredrik Tunaphisch, the editor of Catastrophe Magazine.
Catastrophe Magazine, along with other similar anti-Susan outlets like Galatians 3.1 (and to a lesser extent The Leftovers) have charted a sensible, prudent course – making sure that they are resolutely neither cold nor hot.
The Spiritual Dangers of Susanvacantism
Everyone knows that Catholicism online is a different world to what you find in real life.
If, for example, you went to a typical Catholic parish and asked everyone, ‘Is Susan the pope?’ you’d probably get 100% of the congregation saying ‘Yes.’ You’d also get some odd looks for asking such a stupid question.
Yet if you spend time on engaging with Catholics on Y (formerly X [formerly Twitter]) and elsewhere, it won’t be long before you encounter someone insisting that ‘Pope Susan isn’t really the pope.’
While this view might sound crazy to the average, normal Catholic, it’s understandable to anyone paying attention to Church politics today.
A small – but growing – group of Catholics deny that Susan is the pope.
While this idea option might be tempting, it’s incredibly dangerous to the soul.
Denying the legitimacy of Susan’s papacy means that there is no valid pope – the see of Rome is vacant. This position rests on these two ideas:
That Susan is a woman.
But who are they to say that Susan is a woman?
It’s a well-known provision of Canon Law that the first see is judged by no-one. It is not for mere laymen to be assuming the gender of the pope (let alone judging it).
This would require several warnings, as well as a declaration from the college of Cardinals.
At present, Susan is at most an occultwoman or suspect of being a woman – but until there has been a declaration by authority, we are naturally unable to notice, judge or act on any such idea. This would be private judgment on steroids. This is just like Martin Luther all over again.
That a woman is incapable of being pope.
But while this is a venerable theological thesis, taught by theologians and canonists, has it ever been declared infallibly by the extraordinary magisterium of the Church or by a pope ex cathedra?
….
Folks, it starts strong, and then JUST. GETS. BETTER.
Here’s what makes me sick: BigPharma owns animal health, too. Every BigPharma corporation has an animal health division. As in livestock production. And BigPharma owns the land grant universities and the producers’ associations.
The cattle industry should be screaming about this from the rooftops until they’re blue in the face… but they won’t because their BigPharma Sugardaddies want everyone sick and on statins.
I don’t eat potatoes often, but when I do, they’re deep fried in beef tallow in order to redeem them nutritionally.
And I only eat pancakes once every two years or so, but when I do, they’re shallow fried in bacon grease in order to redeem them nutritionally.
In obedience to humanity, the King of the Universe come down from heaven! In obedience to humanity, He lives imprisoned on the altar! I shall not resist. He allows humans to keep Him wherever they wish-in monstrance or tabernacle; to carry Him in procession; to bring Him into the homes of the sick and dying; to dispense Him to all, whether saint or sinner. The gospel tells how marvelously He obeyed Mary and Joseph. Today He obeys every priest in the world. -St. Alphonsus Liguori
