Author Archives: Ann Barnhardt

Barnhardt Podcast Episode #215: Noah (place to) Hide

Download MP3 file

In this barnburner episode featuring Nurse Claire, Art, Ann and the Good Nurse first discuss the myriad developments, many of which are NOT good, since Noon EST on Monday. We then segue into the main topic of the episode- the very dangerous ascendancy of “Noahide Law”, which many Christians are falling for hook, line and sinker. Many related theological points are covered, points which were common knowledge until the… let’s see… checking my notes here… ah yes! Until the 1960s. Hmmm. It’s almost as if SOMETHING VERY VERY BAD HAPPENED in the 1960s that caused Christian Civilization to auto-destruct at a pace never before seen in human history. My inbox is ready to receive all of the hate mail that this episode will generate, from Trump tribalists to Joooooooooz and Jooooo-adjacents to all Indians (dot, not feather), Feeneyite heretics to Village People fans and anyone named “Timmy”. We cut an especially wide swath in this episode. Our Lady of Copacabana, slayer of the PachaNachoMama demon, pray for us!

Show notes:

NurseClaireSays.com

Joe Biden’s ARSH 1992 Senate Resolution declaring April 14th “Noahide Law/Rabbi Schneerson Day”. NOT SATIRE.

What is Catholic teaching about “deportation”? Maybe not what some higher-ups think.

Larry (Spellman) Ellison Wikipedia entry

Sam Altman Wikipedia entry

 

Watch and spread aggressively. Abortion and transvestite mutilation, the satanic sacraments, both use the exact words of Our Lord: This is M(m)y body. It’s no coincidence.

Golden Dawn Wikipedia entry

Rabbi Schneerson Wikipedia entry

Trump visits grave of Rabbi Schneerson

Vox Day: An Apple Manager’s Experience

Feedback: the email address for the podcast is [email protected]

The Infant Jesus of Prague handles Ann’s financial stuff. Click image for details. [If you have a recurring donation set up and need to cancel for any reason – don’t hesitate to do so!]

img_0778.jpg

Happy Feast of St. Emerentiana, a saint who was never baptized with water.

Golden cup depicting St. Emerentiana being stoned to death at the tomb of St. Agnes

Today is the feast of St. Emerentiana.  While her name might sound obscure, she is actually a very important saint, and I look forward to her feast every year.  St. Emerentiana is described as the “friend” or “foster sister” of St. Agnes of Rome, whose feast we just celebrated on Sunday.  St. Agnes was a young virgin of Roman nobility, who refused to marry and was executed after many torments, including being dragged naked through the streets to a brothel. Despite all the efforts of her tormenters, her virginity and modesty was maintained throughout her martyrdom, and finally giving up, her torturers beheaded her.  You can visit St. Agnes’ skull in the church of St. Agnes in the very famous Piazza Navona in Rome.  St. Agnes is commemmorated in the Canon of every Mass at the Nobis quoque peccatoribus, which is one of the “landmarks” in the Mass wherein the priest says the words out loud, not only so that the faithful might confirm exactly where the priest is in the order of the Mass, but also because the Nobis quoque peccatoribus is one of the NINE instances in the Mass wherein Our Lord offers His forgiveness of our venial sins.  Here is the text of the prayer, which comes after the Consecration – so remember, when this prayer is said, Our Lord is physically substantially present on the altar in the transubstiated host – now Body – and chalice – now Blood, and space-time has been manipulated by God Almighty such that the moment of Calvary intersects and touches that moment of “now”, and thus we are literally present at the foot of the Cross.

Nobis quoque peccatoribus famulis tuis, de multitudine miserationum tuarum sperantibus, partem aliquam, et societatem donare digneris, cum tuis sanctis Apostolis et Martyribus, cum Joanne, Stephano, Matthia, Barnaba, Ignatio, Alexandro, Marcellino, Petro, Felicitate, Perpetua, Agatha, Lucia, Agnete, Caecilia, Anastasia, et omnibus Sanctis tuis, intra quorum nos consortium, non aestimator meriti sed veniae, quaesumus, largitor admitte. Per Christum Dominum nostrum.

To us also, thy sinful servants, confiding in the multitude of Thy mercies, vouchsafe to grant some part and fellowship with Thy holy Apostles and Martrys; with John, Stephen, Matthias, Barnabas, Ignatius, Alexander, Marcellinus, Peter, Felicity, Perpetua, Agatha, Lucy, Agnes, Cecily, Anastasia, and with all Thy saints, into whose company we beseech Thee to admit us, not weighing our merits, but pardoning our offenses.

When the priest says aloud, “Nobis quoque peccatoribus”, it is a pious practice for the faithful praying along with the Mass silently on their knees in the nave, to bow their heads and strike their breast, as this is the fifth of nine moments of contrition and, if the person is so disposed, forgiveness of their venial sins in the Mass.

And little St. Agnes is included in the list of saints invoked by name.

But back to St. Emerentiana.  St. Emerentina’s mother was actually St. Agnes’ wetnurse, and thus what would have been called a “slave” of St. Agnes’ noble family, but really such employees of noble families like these were considered part of the family.  So, St. Agnes and St. Emerentiana, while not blood relatives, were more than friends in the sense that St. Emerentiana was a legal part of St. Agnes’ father’s household.  And, naturally they were playmates and friends, but with a decidedly sisterly dynamic between them.  St. Agnes had told St. Ementiana of Our Lord and His Holy Church, and St. Emerentiana wanted to likewise be a Christian, and was thus receiving convert instruction in preparation for her baptism.  Back in those days, this period of instruction lasted years, as it was deemed absolutely essential that catechumens know and hold the Catholic faith whole and entire.  They had to know what exactly they were professing, and be willing to die for it.  If a catechumen were poorly or incompletely catechized, the odds of them apostatizing under threat or torture obviously increased, and such apostasies were profoundly scandalous. Furthermore, as we have discussed previously, hell for the baptized is far worse than hell for the unbaptized precisely because the baptized soul will know, for all eternity, that they had the Beatific Vision, eternity with God, in their grasp, and they lost it by their own free choice to turn their back on Christ in favor of indulging their appetite for sin.

So, St. Agnes was murdered, and a few days later, St. Emerentiana went to her tomb to pray and mourn.  A group of pagans saw St. Emerentiana weeping and praying at St. Agnes’ tomb, and filled with murderous hatred, they stoned her to death.

So, what do you think?  St. Emerentiana had not yet been baptized.  Was she saved?  The Church says, “Yes!” St. Emerentiana is, in fact, a virgin martyr.  She is an example of what is called The Baptism of Desire, and also in this case because she was murdered for her faith, Baptism of Blood.  She had the faith.  She loved Our Lord and His Holy Catholic Church.  She was actively in the process of being catechized so that she could receive the Sacraments of Initiation.  She wasn’t just a “nice person” who nebulously “tried to live a good life”. She was specifically in the process of entering The One True Church.  And since Our Lord is a Person, and not an impersonal legal code or philosophy, and since Our Lord is not a jerk, and is not limited by His Own Sacraments, He can do what He wants, which is ALWAYS perfectly JUST and MERCIFUL.

Now, there is a heresy floating around that was invented by a priest in the 20th century, a Fr. Leonard Feeney, who fell under the influence of… wait for it… a woman, that is called “Feeneyism”.  Nearly all Trad Catholic bloggers are spammed by, and often times calumniated by a very sad man who is a Feeneyite heretic.  I suspect that this chap, who I will not name, because that would just be throwing gas on the flames of his disorder, is not quite altogether mentally right, as he is completely obsessed with the Feeneyite heresy, and seems to suffer from a total lack of self-awareness and delusions of grandeur.  One of the symptoms of these mental disorders that I have noticed over the years of my internet notoriety, such as it is, from what might be called low-grade Asperger’s all the way up to full-blown paranoid schizophrenia, is that the people in question are utterly convinced that the entire universe is hanging on their every word.  It never occurs to them that the reason no one responds to them is because no one is paying attention.  It never occurs to them that people simply block them, send their emails to the spam folder or to auto-delete, and that they are being ignored.  Again, this is another negative aspect of the internet – it feeds and amplifies not only narcissism, but also mental illness.

The heresy of Feeneyism revolves around the doctrine of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (EENS), which means, “Outside The Church There Is No Salvation”.  Feeneyites argue, very unsuccessfully, that God Almighty is, in fact, limited by His Own Sacraments, and that it is completely impossible for someone who never received Water Baptism to be saved.  So what do Feeneyites say about not just St. Emerentiana, but the other saints that The Church has lifted to the altar? namely, Saints Victor, Rhais and Hericlides, who were all catechumens, and even an unnamed soldier in England during the reign of Diocletian who was converted by St. Alban as the soldier was escorting St. Alban to his execution.  The soldier was thus executed with St. Alban, and The Church thus holds this soldier, St. Alban’s companion, as having been Baptized By Blood.

The Feeneyites tend to stare at their shoes, and then mumble something about these people being “baptized by the angels”.  Well, we can see where this leads.  If the angels come down and baptize with water, then why don’t the angels baptize babies that are about to be murdered by abortion?  And if the angels DO preternaturally baptize babies with water, then why, exactly shouldn’t a woman murder her own child – after all, if the angels swoop down and “baptize” the child, the child goes instantly to heaven, right?  So, yeah, the heresy of Feeneyism leads very quickly to abortion being the greatest act of love and mercy a woman can do for her child.  Murder the child and guarantee it heaven.  Because, folks, ALL HERESIES, BECAUSE THEY ARE BASED ON A FALSE BASE PREMISE, INEVITABLY LEAD TO TOTAL INVERSION. Some heresies only take one or two logical steps to end up at child murder or the like, while some are more subtle and take a few more logical steps, but they ALL end up in hell.  There is only One Truth, and this is why Our Lord said, “Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat. How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leadeth to life: and few there are that find it!”

If you would like to read more about the doctrine of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus, which is so critical, and which is openly denied today by Antipope Bergoglio and the rest of the Freemasonic infiltrators of The Church, I wrote a piece a while back that tries to explain it a bit.  In contemporary parlance, the denial of EENS is called the heresy of “Universalism” and “Indifferentism”.  Long story short, of course there is no salvation outside The Church.  Heaven is The Church Triumphant, that is all the angels and saints INDWELLING inside The Triune Godhead, eternally adoring God “from the inside”, offering the endless Sacrifice of Praise and Thanksgiving.  There is no domain of heaven outside of this.  There is certainly no “Hindu heaven” or “Buddhist heaven” or “Protestant heaven” or “atheist heaven”.  Everyone in heaven is Catholic, because the Catholic Church, Triumphant, is The Father’s House of Many Mansions. And there is no other House.  There is no other Truth. Only hell exists outside of the Beatific Vision.  The domain of hell called “The Limbo of the Innocents” does not involve torment, but it is hell because it is outside of God.  The hell of the damned, which, sadly, most people probably end up in, involves torment because the people there are aware of the fact that they will never see God, and that they COULD have been saved, but freely chose not to be.  God, in His mercy, allows these lost souls to be tormented by demons, and by each other, AS A MERCIFUL DISTRACTION.  Sit in stillness with that until it sinks in.  Not only should it drive home how truly awful eternal damnation will be, but more importantly, it should drive home how incredibly, incomprehensibly GOOD heaven is.  Heaven is so good that the worst possible torment would be for a damned soul to spend all eternity, alone and undistracted, pondering what they will never see by their own free choice – God Himself.

I hope this helps.

St. Emerentiana, pray for us.
Saints Victor, Rhais, Hericlides and the Companion of St. Alban, pray for us.

Christ, have mercy on us.

NOW they ask, “What’s in my arm, yo?” Um, liquid heart attack, clotting agent, cancer juice and AIDS, yo.

And this was obvious as early as February 2020 when they were already saying that they would have a “vaccine” for a “novel virus” that HADN’T EVEN ARRIVED IN THE U.S.

Beyond that, five minutes of research on mRNA technology and Moderna would clearly show you that not only was mRNA technology a complete failure that simply did not work in any context, but that it was also HIGHLY and CUMULATIVELY TOXIC, and had never gotten out of animal trials because it KILLED THE ANIMALS.

So… yeah. A little late asking, “What’s in my arm.” Yo.

The question is, will these idiots fall for this AGAIN as Warp Speed Daddy launches phase two of the mRNA death injections with the psycho Ellison, Gates and Stargate A.I. serving as the scapegoat? You know they’ll blame everything on the computers this time. No need for pardons. It will all be the fault of those pesky computers, darn it.

Some language here:

Watch and spread aggressively. Abortion and transvestite mutilation, the satanic sacraments, both use the exact words of Our Lord: This is M(m)y body. It’s no coincidence.

The philosopher he references is PETER KREEFT. I highly recommend Kreeft’s writings.

Talk about failing an open-book test… If you think this hideous, obviously deranged dyke is in any way a Christian, much less a “bishopess”, you’re as crazy as she is.

Physiognomy matters. Physiognomy tells. Physiognomy speaks volumes.

To cleanse the palate, here is a reminder: REAL MEN KNEEL BEFORE THE EUCHARISTIC LORD. God bless and protect the Swiss Guards, many of whom are Traditionalists.

Interesting fact: when we genuflect to The Lord we put the left foot front and touch the right knee to the ground. If we live to see another Pope after Pope Benedict, and you should have an audience with the Pope, you genuflect when greeting the Pope with the right foot forward and left knee down to differentiate between Christ’s Vicar on Earth and Christ Himself. The Swiss Guard here isn’t double genuflecting (both knees down) before The elevated Host because he is wearing a sword on his left hip, and he is at the ready to leap up and physically defend The Lord and those present, as is his job. Everyone else except the Celebrant (singular!) SHOULD be kneeling on both knees at the Consecration.

If Trump can’t tell the effeminate squish John Roberts, “Hold on, we’re not ready yet,” then how is he going to stand up to the Deep State and New World Order??

I’m genuinely concerned that folks are going to totally relax and rest on their laurels, convinced that Trump is going to “save us”, and even worse that “Trump can do no wrong.”

I’m delighted and relieved that the J6 hostages are all released.

I’m overjoyed that he has ended Birthright Citizenship.

I’m ecstatic that he has abolished “Didn’t Earn It” in FEDGOV.

I’m over the moon that he has declared that there are two sexes.

I’m thrilled that he has withdrawn the former U.S. from the WHO and the Paris Accords.

It’s a good start.

I’m sickened that he’s rubbing shoulders with Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Bezos., Cook, etc.

I’m disgusted that Trump launched a “crypto token” on Friday, the fakest fake money in a world totally awash in fake money, which allegedly puts his net worth at $58 billion… up from $1 billion… in 48 hours. Nigerian romance scammers are more credible.

It’s vomitous that he’s constantly winking at the sodomites by using “YMCA” as his principal theme song. 🤢🤮🤮🤮 And why would he have “Snoop Dogg” perform at an inauguration gala?

It’s heartbreaking that Melania released a book revealing herself to be a militant pro-infant slaughter partisan.

We’re all still waiting for any sort of apology for “Operation Warp Speed”. Tens of millions of people (and counting) killed by the death jabs were unavailable for comment.

I’ve received angry emails from those who think he can do no wrong, which I clearly don’t believe, and from those who think he didn’t swear on the two Bibles because he has converted to Talmudic Judaism, which I also don’t believe barring hard evidence.

Bottom line, yesterday, today and tomorrow:

Nolite confidere in principibus, in filiis hominum, in quibus non est salus.

Put not your trust in princes: In the children of men, in whom there is no salvation.

Psalm 145: 2-3

Let not your hearts be troubled. Christ Jesus doesn’t recognize “Presidential Pardons”. Fauci WILL get justice from Justice Himself.

The tragedy is that Fauci almost certainly will die unrepentant, and thus will choose hell. This is an opportune moment to revisit the utterly essential nature of the death penalty in Christian society, which we so obviously no longer are. And yes, the death penalty, carried out publicly and in an orderly way, is VASTLY superior to the “Luigi Protocol” which affords no opportunity for genuine contrition, sacramental confession and absolution of the criminal. –AB ’25


REPOST BY REQUEST: The Death Penalty Is Essential To A Christian Society and Is Willed By God

The certainty with which one suspects Antipope Bergoglio of being not merely a criminal usurper, but the actual False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist continues to leap higher. He is undeniably attempting to put himself OVER and ABOVE God and His Holy Church, at the head of an Antichurch being erected inside the Vatican so as to deceive the world into believing that the Antichurch is and has replaced the One True Church.

Bergoglio is obviously an Antipope, and has been all along, and sits at the head of the ANTICHURCH. It’s obvious. There is simply no way the Petrine Promise of Our Lord Jesus Christ to His Body and Bride, The Church, can be reconciled to Bergoglio as Pope without violating the Law of Non-contradiction, and thus denying the Divinity of Christ.


Some helpful quotes on the death penalty:

Avery Cardinal Dulles

“The reversal of a doctrine as well established as the legitimacy of capital punishment would raise serious problems regarding the credibility of the magisterium. Consistency with scripture and long-standing Catholic tradition is important for the grounding of many current teachings of the Catholic Church; for example, those regarding abortion, contraception, the permanence of marriage, and the ineligibility of women for priestly ordination. If the tradition on capital punishment had been reversed, serious questions would be raised regarding other doctrines.”
(2004, Avery Cardinal Dulles)

St. Augustine

The same divine authority that forbids the killing of a human being establishes certain exceptions, as when God authorizes killing by a general law or when He gives an explicit commission to an individual for a limited time.

The agent who executes the killing does not commit homicide; he is an instrument as is the sword with which he cuts. Therefore, it is in no way contrary to the commandment, ‘Thou shalt not kill’ to wage war at God’s bidding, or for the representatives of public authority to put criminals to death, according to the law, that is, the will of the most just reason.

(The City of God, Book 1, chapter 21)

St. Thomas Aquinas

It is written: “Wizards thou shalt not suffer to live” (Ex. 22:18); and: “In the morning I put to death all the wicked of the land” (Ps. 100:8). …

Every part is directed to the whole, as imperfect to perfect, wherefore every part exists naturally for the sake of the whole. For this reason we see that if the health of the whole human body demands the excision of a member, because it became putrid or infectious to the other members, it would be both praiseworthy and healthful to have it cut away. Now every individual person is related to the entire society as a part to the whole. Therefore if a man be dangerous and infectious to the community, on account of some sin, it is praiseworthy and healthful that he be killed in order to safeguard the common good, since “a little leaven corrupteth the whole lump” (1 Cor. 5:6).
(Summa Theologiae, II, II, q. 64, art. 2)

The fact that the evil ones, as long as they live, can be corrected from their errors does not prohibit that they may be justly executed, for the danger which threatens from their way of life is greater and more certain than the good which may be expected from their improvement.

They also have at that critical point of death the opportunity to be converted to God through repentance. And if they are so obstinate that even at the point of death their heart does not draw back from malice, it is possible to make a quite probable judgment that they would never come away from evil.”

(Summa contra gentiles, Book III, chapter 146)

“…a secondary measure of the love of God may be said to appear, for capital punishment provides the murderer with incentive to repentance which the ordinary man does not have, that is a definite date on which he is to meet his God. …the law grants to the condemned an opportunity which he did not grant to his victim, the opportunity to prepare to meet his God. Even divine justice here may be said to be tempered with mercy.

St. Alphonsus Liguori

It is lawful to put a man to death by public authority: it is even a duty of princes and of judges to condemn to death criminals who deserve it; and it is the duty of the officers of justice to execute the sentence; God Himself wishes malefactors to be punished.

John Senior

Justice is simply the social good, and it must therefore be done. It is defined as “giving each his due” – cuique sum, “to each his own.” A man is due his life because he is a living thing; it is his nature to have life; and, since it is also his nature to be moral, if a man commits a crime, he must be punished because punishment is retributive – punishment is the penalty due the criminal in justice to him. Proportioned punishment is due him, too, and you cannot deny him that right without yourself committing an injustice against him deserving punishment in turn. The judge who fails the criminal in punishment himself incurs a greater guilt.

There is another justification for punishment besides retribution. Pain and deprivation are medicinal. They hurt so much that the criminal can learn that crime does not pay – or at least that the victims pay back. If you want to teach the prisoner a trade or put him to useful work, well and good; but those things are secondary and must never interfere with the first and proper use of punishment, which is the restoration of the equality of justice not only in society but in the person of the criminal. A person who commits a crime has indulged his will against reason; a disequilibrium has been established in his soul, as Plato says, which can only be righted by retributive exercise of reason against his will. The greatest evil in the world is to do wrong without being punished.

They object to punishment itself; and that is because they deny the existence of justice; and that is because they deny that man is free, that man is responsible for his acts. Crime, they say, is sickness. It must be cured, or better, prevented by prophylaxis of the spirit, by the extermination of free will altogether so that men will react like Pavlov’s dogs to sensitivity training and even to psychosurgery and drugs . . . . They say crime is illness. Now if that were true, there could be no moral act whatsoever. If man is not free to choose evil, he is not free to choose good . . . . Everyone must remember the story of the murderer who said in court: “You can’t blame me, it was my heredity and environment that caused me to kill” and the judge who replied, “It is my heredity and environment that sentences you to hang by the neck until dead.”

(The Death of Christian Culture, Chapter 7)


They Hate God.

(This piece was originally written on May 16, ARSH 2016 for The Remnant Newspaper, four days before Archbishop Georg Ganswein delivered his informative speech on Pope Benedict’s attempted “fundamental transformation” and “expansion” of the Petrine Ministry at the Gregorianum in Rome.  I think the concept it addresses – hatred of God by Diabolical Narcissist clerics and prelates – is very much worth revisiting.  I have only very slightly modified a few phrases to reflect the reality of the Bergoglian Antipapacy qua Antipapacy. I hope it helps. -AB ’25)

A question that I have always asked myself is, “Who are the people who would dedicate their lives to a Church that they clearly hold in contempt at best, and hate at worst? What would drive a man or woman to a life driven by and revolving around such pure, focused spite?”

Who are they? They are Diabolical Narcissists.

To review, Diabolical Narcissism is the condition in which a human being freely chooses to adopt the psycho-spiritual comportment and emotional palate of the fallen angels – demons. Simply put, the DN chooses, exactly as the fallen angels chose, to voluntarily purge himself of all love. As a result, he is voluntarily incapable of empathy, and incapable of the emotions derived from love, namely happiness, gratitude, joy, and sadness.

DNs are capable only of the demonic emotional palette of anger, hatred, envy and fear. They view other human beings as 3-dimensional cartoon objects to be used as the DN sees fit to provide him with diabolical narcissistic satisfaction. And, like the angelic demons, deep down, Diabolical Narcissists know that they are monstrosities, and thus are animated by an unquenchable spite, especially toward those “mere humans”, so far beneath them, and yet capable of that which they have freely rejected: love.

DNs derive the greatest diabolical satisfaction from forming attachments, sometimes referred to as the “idealization phase”, grooming the attachment/victim, then turning on and “devaluing” the attachment/victim, and then viciously abusing the attachment/victim. DNs derive intense diabolical satisfaction from not only the actual abuse of the victim, but oftentimes even more so from the “getting away with it” – watching as others around him, not wanting to incite his wrath or lose their connection to him, give their tacit approval or even their positive approval of his abusive actions. DNs are obsessed with the notion that they are a separate superior caste, an uber-aristocracy, distinct and above everyone else, even “super-human”, and as such the “rules” which apply to the rabble and the great unwashed do not apply to them. One of the greatest sources of diabolical satisfaction for DNs is to openly commit crimes, atrocities, scandalous sin or acts of abuse and NOT be held to account – to operate outside the law or the rules of human decency. In the secular political sphere this is referred to as “oligarchy”. On the micro level it has many names: megalomania, sociopathy and psychopathy.

But what happens when a DN forms such an attachment with, and then devalues, hates, abuses, and even declares war on God?

Well, that, dear reader, is what we call a “Jesuit”. That’s a little joke. This dynamic is certainly not limited to the Jesuits. It is everywhere in the Church, and can be seen amongst the laity, and Traddyland is by no means immune.

First, the initial phases of the DN’s “relationship” with God.

It is typically cerebral narcissists, as opposed to somatic or “physical” narcissists, that seek out God Himself as an attachment/victim. Cerebral Diabolical Narcissists see God as the ultimate attachment, and eventually, as the Ultimate Victim – which, ironically, is exactly what He is. God is everything that DNs want to be: omniscient, awe-inspiring, admired and adored, mysterious and much-discussed, perfect. Some DNs, especially those that were deified as children, will view God as their only peer, casting themselves in the role of co-God, fourth person of the “Quatrine Godhead”, or demiurge.

Across the board, these DNs believe themselves to be the “only one” who genuinely “understands” God. They believe that they have a completely unique and privileged relationship with God. It is the DN and God, alone together, against the world. Some in the protestant cult milieu will even use terms like “anointed”. DNs believe that they derive authority from their privileged relationship with God, and that this authority exempts and dispenses them from laws and behavioral standards as they apply to “mere humans”. They believe that the rules do not apply to them, but that they are able to sit in God-like judgment of others without countenancing the slightest hint of hypocrisy.

It bears mentioning at this point that the deification of children is no longer the rarity that it once was, found typically in years past with genius children and the children of heredity monarchs. In fact, the entire post-Christian education system and media complex today is specifically designed to drive children into pathological effeminacy at best and full-blown Diabolical Narcissism at worst. If the children around you today seem like insufferable mini-tyrant “Social Justice Warrior Gestapo”, it is because that is exactly what they are. They are an army of DN Stormtroopers, eagerly awaiting their orders, convinced of their “otherness”, and perhaps more importantly, regarding other human beings as expendable animated sacks of meat.

For DNs who enter the priesthood, religious communities, or who find themselves in a position of authority within The Church, be it working in the Chancery, or even laymen working within the Church, their predisposition toward cruelty, sadism and abuse is facilitated by any position of authority, even if they have not yet turned on and devalued God. Their default position of contempt for others is intrinsic to their diabolical nature, and thus they are attracted to positions in which they can, under the guise of authority, dole out narcissistic abuse.

In the beginning of the “relationship” with God, the DN idealizes God, in the sense that the DN convinces himself that God is completely congruent to himself. The more he learns about God, the more he sees himself in God. At this point, one should be reminded of the Archangel Michael whose very name is a refutation of this very dynamic: Who is like God? The Archangel knows that the answer to that question is NO ONE. To the DN, the answer, exactly like Lucifer’s answer is, “ME!”

After a while, the DN becomes disillusioned with God. When the world fails to fall at the DN’s feet, when the DN is not regarded, adored and obeyed as co-God, when God “fails to deliver”, the DN then devalues and turns on God just as with a human attachment/target. Interestingly, this devaluing almost always goes in steps, working up finally to God Himself. For example, a DN might first turn on and devalue his parish, his religious community, his Rite (going from Roman to Byzantine, for example), or even his vows (taking a concubine(s) of either sex). These are all mere stops along the road to the final destination for the DN, the rejection of God Himself. When this happens, the DN declares war on God Himself and, motivated by pure diabolical spite, sets out to do as much damage to God as he can. After all, the bigger the enemy, the more grandiose the DN feels. And there is no bigger enemy to set oneself against than God Himself. What this means for the DN is exactly the same as what it means for the actual demons: hurting and even killing the souls of other human beings out of hatred for God – an exact inversion of the Second Great Commandment, hating others for the hatred of God.

One of the surest signals of Diabolical Narcissism in general is what is referred to as “hating your own”. In the context of The Church, the DN priest or religious (and let’s not forget the loud but dwindling army of apostate lesbian nuns prowling throughout the world seeking the ruin of souls) will hold in the highest contempt orthodox, pious, devout Roman Catholics. In the micro context, a DN will typically devalue and abuse those closest to him – spouse, children, employees, even eventually friends, which are typically just sycophants. Non-sycophantic acquaintances usually cotton to the DN and flee for their own well-being in short order. To the DN, his “flock”, in whatever form it takes, becomes his hostage. And the greatest rush of diabolical satisfaction a DN can procure is the attention, affirmation and even adoration of the very people he is taunting, tormenting and abusing, while he is abusing them.

The most strategically effective position for a DN to do this is INSIDE THE CHURCH. And so, despite their descent into full-blown hatred of God, instead of leaving the Church, they entrench. They climb the Episcopal/Curial ladder. The higher they go, the more damage to souls they can wreak; the more they can enable and protect others like themselves who seek to abuse God and destroy His Church; the more they can destroy the Liturgy; the more they can punish and scandalize those who foolishly love God; the more lies they can tell the miserable, pathetic sheep, and then sit back and watch the sheep skip merrily into hell AT THEIR COMMAND, ignoring the very Voice of the Shepherd Himself; the more they can shake their fists at God, luxuriating in their crimes and not just their total immunity from any earthly consequences, but even to the cheers and cries of adoration of the sheep whom they are slaughtering – adoration given to them instead of to God.

Do I think that certain high-ranking churchmen today could be (or already are) Diabolical Narcissists? Of course.  In fact, I think most of them are.

Do I think that it is likely that they have devalued and are now consciously abusing God and with malice aforethought seeking to destroy His Holy Church even from the usurped See of Peter? Of course.  I think that is obvious.

Do I think that Antipope Jorge Bergoglio is already trying to cast himself to the world as somehow over, above and “beyond” Jesus Christ Himself? Of course.  That is also obvious. He, and his coven of Freemasonic sodomites, are building the Antichurch in the rubble of the True Church which they are systematically demolishing.

Christ, have mercy.

That look? Pure hatred of the Eucharistic Lord. This photograph was taken nearly a decade ago. Antipope Bergoglio no longer celebrates the Mass, publicly or privately, and hasn’t for several years, even though he is very much physically capable of doing so. Golly, IF ONLY THERE WERE VISIBLE SIGNS THAT BERGOGLIO IS AN APOSTATE ANTIPOPE.

It’s funny because it is so very, very true….