For the life of me I cannot comprehend why it is so hard for people to understand this. But I will explain it One. More. Time.
By now, it is clear to even the most deluded, normalcy biased Pollyanna that Jorge Bergoglio is an imbecile, a diabolical narcissist, a materialist and stridently anti-Catholic. We’re not going to waste any more time debating this base premise because it is objective reality. It is right in front of all of us, and has been for almost three years now. The sun rises in the east, water is wet, and Bergoglio is a self-absorbed idiot who is actively, consciously trying to destroy The Church. Period.
Now, there are still people – people on the side of the angels, Goodguys – who are trying to process all of this by claiming that none of what Bergoglio does matters, his statements are not “ex cathedra”, and implying that anything Bergoglio says that is not explicitly ex cathedra – and that means a formal declaration of dogma, guys, which literally has not happened since ARSH 1950 when Pope Pius XII infallibly defined the dogma of The Blessed Virgin’s Assumption into heaven – is just so much chaff in the wind, meaningless, nothing to worry our pretty little heads over.
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Bergoglio’s spewings, breathlessly picked up and made above-the-fold headline news by the Freemasonic media juggernaut, with whom Bergoglio is OPENLY in bed (see his interviews with atheist Italian media magnate Eugenio Scalfari) are going all over the world, reaching easily billions of human beings in near real-time. And because he is the Pope, the Vicar of Christ on Earth, everything he says and does is massively influential. And here is the influence he is having:
Bergoglio is ratifying people in their MORTAL SINS and REJECTION OF THE ONE HOLY CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC CHURCH. Spare me the semantic bullshit. When that narcissistic toad says these things in his evil, Jesuitical, Clintonesque way (I’m waiting for Jimmy Akin to make the “it depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” argument) he knows damn good and well what he is doing, how it will be understood, reported and spread, and that he, Jorge Bergoglio, will be personally loved and adored by the world for ratifying people in their mortal sins, adding to his temporal power and feeding his diabolical grandiosity complex.
People, especially in this fallen and now post-Christian world, where human minds are darkened by their disconnect from the Church – which Bergoglio gleefully encourages, and in the case of most Catholics, by their unworthy reception of Holy Communion (what percentage of breeding-age Catholics in the West contracept? How many Catholics go to Confession… ever? Yeah….) have poor and selective memories. I have spoken often of the “36 hour news cycle” – if a given scandal does not destroy the reputation or career of the malefactor within 36 hours, it is lost down the memory hole.
But there is one thing that today’s people will remember and remember in tremendous detail, for as long as they live, and that is when someone, particularly someone in authority, ratifies or confirms them in their sins. And kids, there is no higher authority on Earth than the Vicar of Christ. How many emails have I received over the years from people detailing the exact conversation with a priest, both inside and outside the confessional, wherein the priest told them that contraception was not a sin, that masturbation was not a sin, that divorce and remarriage was no problem, that sodomy was just another way to express “love”, that skipping Mass on Sunday was no big deal.
Bergoglio is the effeminate, narcissist heretic local parish priest circa 1978 on nuclear-strength steroids. He will say anything, tell you anything, just so long as you like him, increase his power and feed his cult of personality. And make no mistake, he doesn’t give a shit about you, your soul, its eternal fate, or God. As I have been desperately trying to make everyone understand for years now, these people don’t actually believe any of that “Catholic bullshit”. In fact, they hate it and are embarrassed by it, and are now doing everything they can do permanently destroy it and replace it with a humanist, global politico-religious totalitarian hybrid monstrosity.
This utterly diabolical mindset, using human being as pieces of political currency, three-dimensional cartoons whose only purpose is as sources of narcissistic supply, is not something that we should all merely roll our eyes at, telling ourselves that it is all meaningless, a mere parenthesis to be waited out in awkward silence like a Novus Ordo hymn.
HUMAN SOULS ARE BEING LOST TO ETERNAL HELLFIRE EVERY SINGLE DAY BECAUSE OF THIS DIABOLICAL IMBECILE.
My God, my God, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE? How can you not give a shit that this despicable nihilistic jackass is causing human beings all over the world to die resolutely unrepentant, convinced that not only are their mortal sins not sins, that hell does not exist and souls are annihilated at death, and that NONE OF WHAT THE CHURCH TEACHES MATTERS, AND THAT THEY DID THE RIGHT THING IN BLOWING THE CHURCH OFF YEARS AGO?
I know I’m a convert and all, but isn’t this Day-One-Greatest-Commandment-Great-Commission-John-3:16-Paragraph-One-of-the-Catechism type stuff? I cannot for the life of me comprehend how anyone, when presented with the possibility of another human being lost to hell FOR. ALL. ETERNITY, can start in with the “that’s not my problem”, “not my circus, not my monkeys”, “there’s nothing anyone can do about the salvation of another person”, “if you think you can do anything to help save another person then you’re guilty of malignant pride and are on the fastrack to hell yourself” crap.
You know what I think? I think that’s just a load of effeminate bullshit.
I think that we are supposed to love one another as God loves us. (I’m pretty sure I read that somewhere.)
I think we are supposed to love other human beings and actually give a shit about their eternal souls because God loved them first. (I’m pretty sure I read that somewhere.)
I think we are supposed to instruct the ignorant and admonish the sinner. (I’m pretty sure I read that somewhere.)
I think we are supposed to love truth, thirst for justice and hate evil. (I’m pretty sure I read that somewhere.)
I think we are supposed to actually give a shit about things outside of ourselves and not wallow in the callous indifference and flaccid impotence of naval-gazing narcissism.
I think we – us, specifically, right now, who were born in the mid-to-late 20th century – WE are supposed to rise up and do everything we possibly can, and given the internet and technology of today, our capabilities are mind-boggling, to resist, to fight, and even to support the deposition of Bergoglio so that this mass soul-killing scandal stops. How many more souls are you content to feed to this monster’s ego? I NEED A NUMBER. GIVE. ME. A. NUMBER.
How many? How many more people who were thinking about returning or converting have now blown the Church off because EVERYTHING this moronic arch-heretic has said for the past three years has told them that THE CHURCH DOESN’T MATTER, AND HAS BEEN WRONG ALL ALONG ANYWAY.
How many people are you content to sit and watch go skipping straight into hell because Bergoglio preaches permissiveness as mercy and indifference as charity – and encourages them to do the same? How many grandmas in the West today told their grandson how cute she thinks his boyfriend is, and basked in the warm glow of her own “sophistication” and self-righteousness – because it’s what Pope Francis would want her to do – “accompany” her sodomite grandson “in mercy”.
How many generations are you content to see poisoned by Bergoglio’s heretical filth before someone finally has the stones to anathematize him and call his lying bullshit lying bullshit? Or should we just let it all go until Our Lord returns in Glory? What percentage of human souls who have ever existed are you content to see live and die with Bergoglio’s evil memes and catchphrases bombarding them like a computer server being bombarded by a denial-of-service attack? There have been, at most, 110 billion human beings so far. 7.5 billion of them are alive right now. How many will be added to that in the next century? Next two centuries? Next five centuries? Are we content to sit on our asses and do nothing RIGHT NOW while Bergoglio COULD be countered so that it gets to the point that 50% of all human beings ever created by God will have been infected with, “Well, Pope Francis said….”
How many souls, dammit?!
Look, if you aren’t man enough for this, whatever. Sit your candyass down and stay quiet, Caitlyn, but know this: there are at least a handful of us left on this planet who
A.) actually believe in the Triune Godhead and His Holy Church and what she has taught consistently and infallibly for 2000 years,
B.) refuse to deal in any terms except OBJECTIVE REALITY
C.) actually give a shit about other human beings and where their eternal souls end up – ALL OF THEM,
D.) know that Bergoglio is, every day, driving more souls toward hell, and
E.) fully intend to do something, anything, no matter how ham-fistedly, to try to counter and resist Bergoglio and his lying, soul-killing bullshit because this is the biggest no-brainer ever in the history of the Church.
Some of us only need to be cold-cocked with a two-by-four once. For me it was Bergoglio’s failure to genuflect at the consecration of the Host and Precious Blood at his first Mass post-election in the Sistine Chapel. THWAP. Objective reality. They have Peter’s Chair. It’s war. The fruit of the Third Sorrowful Mystery (the Crowning with Thorns) isn’t cowering effeminacy. It is COURAGE. If you don’t have it, pray for it, and until you get it, STAY THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY BECAUSE WE’RE BUSY OVER HERE.
If you are saying to yourself, “Boy, Ann sure seems angry, and Christians should never be angry….”
Only the person who becomes irate without reason, sins. Whoever becomes irate for a just reason is not guilty. Because, if ire were lacking, the science of God would not progress, judgments would not be sound, and crimes would not be repressed.
Further, the person who does not become irate when he has cause to be, sins. For an unreasonable patience is the hotbed of many vices: it fosters negligence, and stimulates not only the wicked, but above all the good, to do wrong.
(St. John Chrysostom, Homily XI super Matheum, 1c, nt.7)
Ire may be understood in two ways.
In one way, as a simple movement of the will that inflicts punishment not through passion, but by virtue of a judgment of the reason: and in this case, without a doubt, lack of ire is a sin. This is how Chrysostom understands ire when he says: ‘Ire, when it has a cause, is not ire but judgment. For properly speaking, ire is a movement of passion. And when a man is irate with just cause, his ire does not derive from passion. Rather, it is an act of judgment, not of ire.”
In another way, ire can be understood as a movement of the sensitive appetite agitated by passion with bodily excitation. This movement is a necessary sequel in man to the previous movement of his will, since the lower appetite naturally follows the movement of the higher appetite unless some obstacle prevents it. Hence the movement of ire in the sensitive appetite cannot be lacking altogether, unless the movement of the will is altogether lacking or weak. Consequently, the lack of the passion of ire is also a vice, as it is the lack of movement in the will to punish according to the judgment of reason.
(St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, II, II, q. 158, art. 8)