So, a little review for those of you who may be new.

1.  Islam is a political system, NOT a religion, and unless and until humanity wakes the hell up and STOPS referring to it as a religion, there is no hope.  Islam is a hyper-aggressive, militaristic, expansionist, totalitarian political system designed to create a super-rich micro-oligarchical ruling class with a massive, destitute, genetically handicapped underclass below.  The paper-thin faux-religious facade was a conscious, specific con from the very beginning – much like Mormonism and Scientology – a pure racket using borrowed and piggy-backed religious motifs to lend credibility to a massive, loosely-knit network of crime syndicate cells.

Here is a quote from Osama bin Laden that sums it all up:

“Our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issue; one that demands our total support, with power and determination, with one voice, and it is: Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually? Yes. There are only three choices in Islam: [1] either willing submission [conversion]; or [2] payment of the jizya, through physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Islam; or [3] the sword, for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.”
–Osama Bin Laden
(The Al Qaeda Reader, p. 42)

Definition of suzerainty: a situation in which a region or people is a compulsory tributary to a more powerful entity, which controls its foreign affairs while allowing the tributary vassal state internal autonomy.

Please note that the quote above makes perfectly clear that islam DOES NOT CARE IF YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE ANY OF THEIR FAUX-RELIGIOUS BULLSHIT OR NOT – BECAUSE THAT’S NOT THE POINT.  All that matters is EARTHLY submission and control of landmass.  All of that five-times-per-day sticking one’s butt in the air while some bisexual shrieks about a non-existent pagan moon deity over a loudspeaker is not “prayer”.  It is an outward sign of submission to the musloid political system.  NOTHING more.  It’s a gang signal.  It’s a salute.

Islam isn’t about “allah” or “paradise” or “prayer” or “spirituality” or how human beings should relate to one another or how human beings should relate to a “god” or the eternal fate of the human soul. THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT ANY OF THAT. Islam is about acquiring physical, earthly territory and installing a totalitarian government over the earth that provides a cadre of “elites” masquerading as some sort of “clergy” with massive decadent wealth and as much twisted perverted sex as they want, including homosexual and heterosexual pedohilia, ephebophilia, concubinage, incest, bestiality and necrophilia. There is nothing new under the sun. They want power, they want money and they want sex. The “religious” aspects are a stone-cold con, which Bin Laden himself declared in no uncertain terms.

2.  They can’t be reasoned with.  They can’t be dialogued with.  There is no such thing as “radical islam”.  There is islam, which is even more bloodthirsty, conscienceless and perverse than what we are seeing today.  We cannot possibly imagine what they would do if given true carte-blanche.  Islam today is like an eleven year old boy – just BARELY on the cusp of puberty, just BEGINNING to test the waters.  These beheadings, rapes, suicide attacks and terror operations are BUSH LEAGUE.  Just as it is nonsensical and depraved to refer to Nazis as “radical Nazis” and “moderate Nazis” – as if ANY Nazism could ever be considered acceptable, so it is with islam.  This is why Egyptian president Sisi’s recent speech calling for a “reformation” of islam is nonsense.  All Sisi’s speech did was confirm that Sisi himself doesn’t actually believe any of it, and instead of doing the morally correct thing and renouncing islam, Sisi wants to have his pancakes and eat them too.  He wants everyone – like him – to subscribe to and associate themselves with something that they don’t actually believe in or take seriously.  (How very Pope Francis of him.)  Well, you can pour maple syrup on a puddle of bloody, diarrhetic hogshit all you want, but it will never, ever be pancakes.

3.  Just to be sure that the info is out there as much as possible, here is the “offensive” mohammed cartoon, followed by a link to a cartoon published a while back by the same magazine depicting the Holy Trinity – in retaliation for the Church reiterating that sodomite “marriage” was an ontological impossibility, and that the farce of “gay marriage” was a grave evil.  I can’t post the cartoon of the Trinity because I just can’t.  But I will describe it, and then you can decide whether you want to look at it or not.  God the Father is on the left, depicted as a grey, bearded man, glassy-eyed, mouth open, tongue hanging out like a dog, bending over at the waist being sodomized by God the Son, also glassy-eyed, wearing the crown of thorns, holes visible in His hands and feet, who is in turn being sodomized by the Holy Spirit, depicted as the triangle with the all-seeing eye in the center.  Here it is.

The picture of mohammed below says, “100 lashes if you don’t die laughing!”

That’s it.  That’s all.

So people like islam-appeaser Bill Donohue who argue that islam was “provoked” would only have a rhetorical leg to stand – and a feeble one at that – only if any other Christian anywhere had responded to the Charlie Hebdo cartoon of the Trinity in any way other than praying for the conversion and salvation of the Charlie Hebdo staff and readership.  If you pray the rosary, you do just that many times per day.

“O My Jesus, forgive us our sins.  Save us from the fires of hell, and lead all souls to heaven, especially those in most need of Thy Mercy.”

4.  I see that there have been many protest marches and gatherings in France wherein people are holding up signs saying, “Je suis Charlie.”  “I am Charlie.”  Um, I’m not Charlie.  These people were not the pillars of society or role models, as evidenced by their pro-sodomite blasphemy linked above.  Satan frequently uses these multi-vectored attacks because one has to be able to process multiple datasets simultaneously AND identify and maintain the connections (and disconnections) between them.  And, as we have discussed before, modern western man has been so dumbed-down and contra-educated that holding ONE premise and following a single-track logical progression is nearly impossible for most people today.  In this case, we have to juggle multiple subjects and then tease out the truth and the morally upright position and reaction.  Let’s see if we can do it.

A.) These people did not deserve to be murdered.  Obviously.
B.) They are not martyr saints.
C.) Freedom of speech is not a “god” unto itself.  Only God is God, and His rights trump ours.  Americans, in particular, have a tendency to worship the Constitution and the American governmental paradigm, particularly with regard to the “rights of man” over and above God.  Careful with that.  It’s a very slippery slope.
D.) The issue here is islam, and the fault, blame and culpability for these murders lies squarely in the lap of islam and nowhere else.  No excuses can be made, no justification can be fabricated, no quarter can be given.  Islam cares not a whit about our arguments amongst ourselves regarding freedom of speech or anything else.  All islam cares about is complete earthly submission to islam, and it will happily let us argue amongst ourselves while it slaughters us where we sit.

5.  I’d like to mention briefly the fact that a woman let the gunmen into the building, knowing exactly who and what they were and what they were going to do.  Apparently she was scared, and the gunmen told her they were not going to kill her – and they didn’t.

I think that level of cowardice she displayed in that situation is criminal and should be prosecutable as involuntary manslaughter.  Here are the criteria for Involuntary Manslaughter:

a.  Someone was killed as a result of act by the defendant.  Check.
b.  The act either was inherently dangerous to others or done with reckless disregard for human life.  Check.
c.  The defendant knew or should have known his or her conduct was a threat to the lives of others.  Check.

But then, are we surprised that a person associated with this magazine was lacking in the moral virtue of courage?  Again, be very careful about enthusiastically attaching yourself to these magazine people as heroes or role models.  See the big picture without being pulled down into the weeds.