Cardinal Cajetan:

“If someone, for a reasonable motive, holds the person of the pope in suspicion and refuses his presence and even his jurisdiction, he does not commit the delict of schism, nor any other whatsoever.”

Yup. Think about it. How could ANY Antipapacy EVER be resolved if it were schism to even ask the question?

Now, consider, all previous Antipopes were CATHOLICS. Every single one. All previous Antipapacies were political intrigues among CATHOLICS. Antipope Bergoglio is the first observably apostate Antipope.

Folks, this isn’t hard. This is the biggest open-book test in history. Heck, the answers are written on the chalkboard, and Our Lord and Our Lady are walking the rows pointing directly to the answers. Here’s prophecy, here’s what Pope Benedict said, here’s Canon Law, here’s Bergoglio’s apostate words and deeds for eleven years, here’s COMMON SENSE.

As I have said so many times, the greatest act of violence one can do against the Petrine See in se, is to call a man, “Peter” who is not Peter. Antipope Bergoglio has turned almost everyone, from Libs to Trads, against the Papacy in and of itself. The only Trads left that love the Papacy, and see the brilliance of the Petrine See as established by Jesus Christ Himself as a Monarchy with special supernatural NEGATIVE protection, are those of us who know that Pope Benedict never validly resigned, and Bergoglio is and always has been an Antipope. We know that Vatican I and the infallible definition of Papal Infallibility was a gift from God, to US, in this moment, right now, so that we could KNOW that Bergoglio is, without a doubt, an Antipope.

Ergo, Antipope Bergoglio is as much the standard of schism from the Catholic Church as Taylor Swift is.