Folks, I know it’s difficult to come to terms with, but the greatest force of evil in the world today is centered in the former United States.

Washington. Government/military.

New York. Finance.

Hollywood. Media.

In short, “We’re the Baddies”.

IF Putin is taking out Fauci’s bioweapon labs, then we all will owe Putin a debt of gratitude on that score.

Again, I know it’s hard to come to terms with such betrayal, but it is absolutely essential to deal in the PRESENT REALITY, not in the nostalgia we have for the past. No amount of wishing will make the current American power centers anything other than what they are: irredeemably evil.

0:19 mark. Stromectol (3mg Ivermectin) pills for Her Majesty’s Masonic Sniffles?

I hope she survives and lives many more years so that she can repent, convert to Catholicism, and do penance for her life of living as a billionaire while claiming to be the Head of State and “Pope” of the Anglican schismatic sect, with one of her titles being “Defender of the Faith” while she presided over and signed off on: legalization of no-fault divorce, legalization of abortion, legalization of sodomy, legalization of euthanasia/murder by NHS, and the legalized invasion of the U.K. and the irreversible destruction of her own race.  Not to mention going along with the CoronaScam.  Her family is a humiliating train wreck for a reason.

Consilience, consilience, consilience.

Now, Windswept House (the novel published in ARSH 1996 written by Vatican insider Malachi Martin, described by Martin himself as “historical FACTion”, that is, extremely thinly-veiled non-fiction given just enough cover to legally protect Martin from lawsuits, detailing a plot by satanist infiltrators of the Vatican to force the Pope to “resign” and installing their own satanic Antipope to destroy the Church from the inside) isn’t “evidence” on the level of Canon Law, Pope Benedict’s words in February ARSH 2013, his subsequent words and deeds, or the words of +Ganswein in May-June ARSH 2016.  BUT, Windswept House is undeniably something that has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be a genuinely INFORMED piece of evidence that belongs in the “very, very, VERY Interesting” file, and contributes to the massive consilience of the dataset demonstrating that Pope Benedict never validly resigned.

And what do we see? Martin explicitly predicted that not only would the true Pope draw a distinction between the munus and the ministerium in his coerced putative resignation, but that this distinction would cause the blood of the enemy infiltrators to run cold – because the distinction was legally pivotal, as we have been saying, nay, SCREECHING for over half-a-decade now. Further, Martin predicted that the College of Cardinals and Bishops would just gloss right over this distinction out of both ignorance and malignant indifference.

Folks, there is NO WAY Martin’s narrative is mere coincidence.  NONE. The only major difference between Martin’s narrative and reality is that Martin thought that it was JPII, hence “the Slavic Pope”, that the satanists/Freemasons were going to go after. Alas, no.  It was the BAVARIAN Pope, who had a history of quitting, that was the target. Martin died (under mysterious circumstances) in ARSH 1999 and thus never saw in this life how the events he knew were planned for decades actually unfolded.

It’s right there on page 553, which I have screen capped from the free online version linked above, and which I will also type out so that the citation text populates on search engines.

Note that this passage opens with an explicit declaration by Martin that “synodality” is an evil device being used by the enemy infiltrator “progressive extremists” to attempt to wreck the Church and reduce the Papacy to a meaningless figurehead position devoid of real authority.  SOUND FAMILIAR???

Note also that Martin naturally assumes a WRITTEN, SIGNED resignation protocol document.  And remember well that Pope Benedict never signed ANYTHING, and never made any changes to Canon Law with regards to Papal resignation protocol.

Oh, ONE more thing.  Klaus Schwab – yes, THAT Klaus Schwab – appears in Windswept House under the name “Jacques Deneuve”. You can’t make this stuff up.

Graziani* brought his argument to a tactless crescendo. The Pope did not appoint the bishops, he said. “We do – with Your Holiness.” The Pope did not decide what teachings were heretical, he said. “We do – with Your Holiness.” The Pope did not decide who would become a Cardinal, he said. “We do – with Your Holiness.”

“If this is so – and it is so, Holiness – all that the majority of your Cardinals and bishops wish is that we formalize this present and actual collegial arrangement. Truth in our words! That is what the Church needs, Holy Father. Put an end to the misery of our self-doubts, of our quarreling, of our failure in faith. Confirm us in our collegial faith, we beg you.”

The Slavic Pope listened in silence. None could tell if he cast his mind back over the two pontificates adduced by the Cardinal Secretary of State.  None saw any sign that he questioned the agreement of those predecessors to a format of governance that had allowed abuses and extended freedom to progressivist extremists. None knew if he suffered a moment of regret at the confusion caused by those two prior Popes who had aided mightily in shredding the once seamless fabric of the Church’s papacy. Nor would they ever know.

The Slavic Pope leaned forward ever so slightly and read the Resignation Protocol one more time. Seven pairs of eyes watched as he uncapped his fountain pen.  Watched as he brought the tip down until it almost touched the signature line…. Then he paused. “As successor to the Holy Apostle Peter…”

At those words from the Slavic Pope, the blood froze in every heart but his.

“As successor to the Holy Apostle Peter, I take this most extreme measure in order to ensure the unity of my bishops with this Holy See. As Bishop of Rome, I initial this document. Each of Your Eminences is a co-signatory.  This is a truly collegial act. So help us God, the Father of all.”

None of the Cardinals knew exactly what distinction the Holy Father meant to draw, if any, between his role as the successor to the Apostle and his role as the Bishop of Rome. None knew; and none cared. With a quick flourish, His Holiness initialed the Protocol. Then, unwilling to wait for the attending power brokers and papal aspirants to affix their own signatures, he rose from his chair in unexpected haste.  With Monsignore Daniel** barely a stride behind him, the validly elected successor to Peter was gone.

*Graziani = Cardinal Angelo Sodano, Secretary of State under JPII and Pope Benedict.  Sodano was in the pay of the satanic sex cult, The Legionaries of Christ and protected their drug-addled bisexual incestuous child rapist founder Macel Maciel Dellogado, and high-level Legion priests engaged in egregious sexual misconduct and financial intrigue, such as Fr. Thomas Williams. The Secretary of State at the time of Pope Benedict’s failed partial attempted abdication was Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, also mired in financial scandal, who claimed to have known months in advance of Pope Benedict’s “intentions”. After Bergoglio’s usurpation, Bertone was quickly hustled out, and the Chinese asset Pietro Parolin was installed as Secretary of State.

**Monsignore Daniel = Monsignore Stanislao Dziewicz, JPII’s Polish personal secretary, who was also wildly corrupt and provided manipulative and dishonest counsel to Pope JPII in order to grease his own palms and secure his position.  The direct analogue to Dziewicz when the narrative is mapped onto Pope Benedict XVI is, of course, +Georg Ganswein, Pope Benedict’s personal secretary and double-dealing false friend, and some say, prison guard.

Dear Ann,

I’ve taken the liberty to rewrite the Canadian national anthem (to be sung kneeling, preferably with a gun pointed at you.)

Text to be sung to the original melody.

Signed,

Giancarlo Ciccia, Proud Italo-Canadian

O Chinada!

Trudeau’s new prison-yard!

Individual rights from all thy sons are barred.

With trampled bones we pay the price

Of standing strong and free!

From East to West unto Ottawa

We drive our trucks to plea:

God rid our land, sea to shining sea,

Of Castro’s son that we may rise proud ‘n free!

So honk your horns and take your stand with me!

Yes, that’s literally what they are claiming caused this – that she didn’t eat breakfast.

The sheer number of these things happening at exactly the moment a camera is rolling tells you just how numerous these events are. This is happening to A LOT of people, and a certain minuscule percentage are caught on camera, but that minuscule percentage gives us a steady stream of clips like this.

Largest crime against humanity and mass psychosis event in human history by orders of magnitude, and we might be in just the very, very early phase of it. And barring supernatural intervention it will never, ever end without hot war.

And seeing the multitudes, He went up into a mountain, and when He was set down, His disciples came unto Him. And opening His mouth, He taught them, saying: Blessed are the poor in spirit; for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Matthew 5: 1-3

The First Beatitude is another grossly misread and misunderstood verse, with the misunderstanding being a recent phenomenon, spurred by a conscientious perversion of the meaning of the verse by Marxist infiltrators beginning in the 20th century.  And now most especially by Antipope Bergoglio, as one would expect of the probable False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist and head of the Freemasonic, sodomitical New World Order Antichurch.

Most people read this verse and see the words “blessed” and “poor” and think that Jesus is saying that poor people are morally superior to rich people. You can see why Marxists, like Antipope Bergoglio, jumped all over this verse. They have twisted it into a class warfare battle cry. Other people see the words “blessed” and “poor” and also the prepositional modifier “in spirit”, have no idea what to make of it, glaze over, start thinking about football or Zumba class, and just smile and nod like the Stepford Baptized Pagan-zombies that they are.

I’m a huge fan of punctuation. Especially properly-utilized apostrophes. But I’m also a fan of ellipses and the humble comma.

“Let’s eat Grandma!” or, “Let’s eat, Grandma!”
PUNCTUATION. SAVES. LIVES.

I think that we can understand the First Beatitude with far more ease if we slip a set of “here comes the kicker pregnant pause” ellipses in between the subject, “the poor”, and the prepositional phrase, “in spirit.” Thus:

Blessed are the poor . . . in spirit.

Does that help? Our Lord isn’t saying that poor people are by definition morally superior to rich people. Not at all. Common sense tells us that that is simply not true.  What He is saying is that a person who is detached from their wealth and is willing to take the First Commandment literally and seriously, put God first, and “push their chips all-in”, to use a poker metaphor, is truly blessed. So, given this, ANYONE within the wealth spectrum, rich or poor, can possess this virtue. This also means that anyone within the wealth spectrum can LACK this virtue.

There are two separate classifications that we need to address and combine in order to understand this dynamic: poor in spirit and poor in fact, and their antipodes, rich in spirit and rich in fact. If we form a matrix of these characteristics, there are four possible output combinations. Let’s go through each.

I. Poor in spirit and poor in fact:

This is a person who does not have any great wealth, but is also content and still maintains a spirit of generosity and gratitude. This condition is exemplified by the parable of the Widow’s mite in Mark 12: 41-44. The poor widow gave the smallest tithe in absolute terms, but it was greater than the tithes of the rich because, “she of her want cast in all she had, even her whole living.” The widow was detached even from what little she had, even though on a percentage basis it far, far exceeded what the rich tithed. The widow was both poor in fact, and poor in spirit.

Being poor in spirit and poor in fact is GOOD.

II. Rich in spirit and poor in fact:

This is the person who lives beyond their means and is preoccupied with the APPEARANCE and ACQUISITION of wealth. (Cough, cough. Ring any bells? Ahem.) This is the person who leverages himself out the gazoo so that he can have the 4000 square foot house and the luxury car . . . even though he only makes $65k per year. This would also be the welfare denizen who scoffs at honest work and lives off of the government, but has a 55″ LCD TV and PlayStation, and has multi-thousand dollar hair extensions and intricately manicured fingernails. No. Way. Girl. I did NOT just go there. Oh yes I did.

Being rich in spirit and poor in fact is BAD.

III. Rich in spirit, rich in fact:

This is the rich person who is very much attached to their wealth, and places the preservation of their wealth as their top priority. I did an interview on Peter Schiff’s streamed-to-video radio show not long after I shut down Barnhardt Capital Management in late ARSH 2011, which Schiff has since removed from YouTube.  But, this is the transcript of the exchange that speaks directly to this topic:

Schiff: Let me ask you, your call for a strike, what exactly does that entail? If people wanted to follow what you’re saying, how would we have a strike? What would people do?

Ann: Close all of your securities accounts, bring all of your money home and stop trading all markets: futures, stocks, everything. Man up, act like you’ve got a pair and shut it down.

Schiff: Well, that would put me out of business. I mean, if all of my customers would close down their . . . .

And there you have it. Peter Schiff, like almost everyone else in our culture, can’t fully acknowledge the objective reality of what is happening, and thus can not respond in a fully virtuous way because he is, first and foremost, attached to his wealth and simply can not bring himself to push his wealth “all-in” in service to justice and truth. In other words, he can’t get past the First Commandment.  If we take him at his word in the quote above, he will not tell his clients that they are at risk, recommend that they liquidate, or shut down his firm because he is attached to and has defined himself by his firm and the wealth that it generates for him.

Now please understand the distinction here: Mr. Schiff’s firm and the wealth it has amassed Mr. Schiff is not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself – no more so than my firm and the wealth that it generated for me over the years was “bad”. Not only are these things not necessarily bad, they actually have the potential to be good!

What IS bad is the inordinate ATTACHMENT and unwillingness to LAY DOWN that “good thing” in service to a GREATER GOOD, which in this case is justice and truth, which are constitutive qualities of God Himself. I was willing to lay my “good thing” down because I understood the First Beatitude and the promise of Christ that in laying down my “good thing” I might later inherit a far better thing, namely a wee little corner of the Kingdom of Heaven. As a trained arbitrageur, I recognize a good swap when I see it. Wink.

This is what Christ meant when He said, “And again I say to you: It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of heaven. And when they had heard this, the disciples wondered very much, saying: Who then can be saved? And Jesus beholding, said to them: With men this is impossible: but with God all things are possible.” Matthew 19: 24-27

Our Lord isn’t saying that the rich are intrinsically evil purely because they are rich. That is what the Marxists want you to believe. He is saying that it is EXTREMELY difficult for wealthy people to maintain DETACHMENT from their wealth, and the richer people become, the more attached they tend to be to their wealth. But He goes on to say that there is hope! All things are possible through Him! Let’s all pray that Peter Schiff, and all wealthy people of good will, by the power of the Holy Ghost, are able to detach themselves from their wealth and shove that camel through that needle, because IT CAN BE DONE.

Being rich in spirit and rich in fact is BAD.

IV. Poor in spirit, rich in fact:

Very simply, this is a person who is at any level of financial comfort above “poor” who is willing to push their wealth “all-in” if that is what is required to follow Christ fully. (The truly blessed then learn that The Van Down By The River not only isn’t so bad, it can be the best thing ever. But that requires a huge leap of faith. Trust me, I know.)

Being poor in spirit and rich in fact is GOOD.

Finally, the supreme illogic and breathtaking internal contradiction of this particular Antipope Bergoglio luciferian bloody porcine rhetorical diarrhea must be stated for the record:

According to Antipope Bergoglio, being materially poor is a morally superior state of being and a requirement for “salvation”, but yet we must redistribute wealth so that the materially poor cease to be materially poor, because life isn’t worth living if you are materially poor, and being materially poor is the worst possible thing that a person can be. So everyone has to be both materially poor AND not materially poor, because being materially poor is simultaneously the best, most ideal state of human existence that must be sought and embraced AND the worst, most horrific state of human existence that must be decried and eliminated.

And that, folks, is what you call a textbook violation of the Law of Non-contradiction.

How infinitely good is The Divine Providence to make certain that the Antipope and likely False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist is so VISIBLY a luciferian imbecile? The only way you could be tricked by the Bergoglian Antipapacy is if you had some attachment… like to say, oh, I dunno, just spitballing here… MONEY, INCOME, CAREER, or even just social status, that you were unwilling to DETACH from. Cough. See category III. Cough.

As always, I hope this helps.

 Antipope “Fredo”. Not Michael. Michael Corleone is Lucifer. The Antipope and probable False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist is FREDO. Because VISIBILITY, VISIBILITY, VISIBILITY.