Monthly Archives: July 2021

Why Pope Benedict wrote Summorum Pontificum with the “Extraordinary Form” language. He had a very good reason and knew EXACTLY what he was doing.

Summorum Pontificum is a stop-gap and was only ever intended as such. Everyone with two brain cells to rub together who isn’t addicted to grifting good-hearted and generous Trad Catholics, addicted to benzodiazepines and/or has more faith in Evolution and Martians than Jesus Christ, knows this.

The reason Pope Benedict deployed the “two forms of the same Rite” language, thus “Extraordinary Form” for the August and venerable Rite of Pius V, and “Ordinary Form” for the Novus Ordo, is because if he hadn’t specifically done that, almost every bishop on earth, being almost totally infiltrated by Freemasons, God-hating heretics, apostates, and/or sodomites, would have instantly demanded that every priest offering the Traditional Latin Mass acquire “bi-ritual faculties”. As if they were asking permission to offer the Divine Liturgy in one of the Byzantine Rites – which is a TOTALLY legit permission. I know bi-ritual priests, and there is significant legwork associated with the permission, as there should be so as to avoid every hint of syncretism (mixing the two Rites together).

How would the infiltrator Swishops have used the “bi-ritual faculty” thing to totally forbid and quash the TLM? Probably by giving a Latin grammar exam that Cicero himself couldn’t have passed. “Sorry, you aren’t fluent in Latin, so you can’t offer the Mass in Latin.”

Folks, it would be EASY to formulate an English grammar exam that I would fail spectacularly. Grammar goes deep – far, far beyond the “vulgar” use of any language by its mother-tongue speakers and writers. Latin is no different.

Pope Benedict, knowing exactly the fiends he was totally surrounded by and up against and (in his mind, almost certainly) overwhelmed by, wrote SP so as to cut them off at the pass: “two forms of the Roman Rite, Ordinary and Extraordinary”… therefore NO BI-RITUAL FACULTIES NEEDED.

Then the invalid attempted resignation and the Bergoglian Antipapacy happened.

And let me say this now so you all understand what is happening:

All “Trad Inc.” partisans who are now happily looking forward to the suppression of the TLM when the “reimagining” of Summorum Pontificum by Antipope Bergoglio is released on July 7th (the anniversary of SP being promulgated by Pope Benedict in ARSH 2007) is because… wait for it…

THEY PRIVATELY HATE AND DESPISE LITURGY, ESPECIALLY THE MASS. They want it suppressed so they have another “excuse” to not go to the Foot of the Cross.

One Trad Inc. $20k per month grift-master has totally apostatized, and went to Mass on Easter 2021 only because his wife forced him to go, and he hadn’t been to Mass for the previous 13 months, even though it was available DAILY even though the lockdowns, and hasn’t been since. Pray that his newborn somehow, someway gets baptized, and isn’t used as a tool of rebellion against God by his apostate father.

His psychological puppet-mistress, a self-confessed benzodiazepine-dependent with self-confessed massive psychiatric and preternatural oppressions (i.e. received a Novus Ordo demonic exorcism in the mid-80s) and braggadocious grifter of “gullible dumb-ass Trads” has only attended Mass a few times per YEAR for over a decade, despite claims of being an intimately involved parishioner in Rome, and then, even more unjustly and scandalously, poisoning the reputation of a Benedictine monastery in Europe. This truly wicked harridan tried for years to get me to become an oblate of this excellent Benedictine monastery by saying, “You’re dumb if you actually go to Mass. If you become an oblate, and the oblation thing is all meaningless- all you do is scribble a signature in a book – then you get all the merits of the Monks in their praying of the Office and Mass. And then you don’t have to sit through all of that long, STUPID, BOOOORING liturgy. I’d maybe go to Mass if it weren’t so LONG and BOOORING. But I don’t have to, because I’m an oblate. Oh yeah, you’re stupid if you ACTUALLY GO.”

And THAT, friends, is why I never became an oblate of anything, and probably never will. Even though I know that that woman was in those many repeated diatribes the voice of satan himself, that mind worm poison of “you legally get the merit…” means I’ll never personally become an oblate. Because I want to go. I want to be at the Foot of the Cross. No excuses. No imagined legalistic dispensations. And that’s okay.

Aside: Why am I suddenly craving incredibly delicious BEER??? 🤔

Famous near-daily rants by Trad Inc. grifter “thought leaders” in private social media groups and in person:

LET THE ROMAN RITE be totally suppressed! Good! Break Romanism! Break Latinism! Break the Papacy! Catholicism has become IDOLATRY in and of itself! Evolution and UFOs are reality. Catholicism has no future. We were all victimized by a cult! Ratzinger can go to hell! He abandoned us just like my Boomer dad! The sooner these dumb-ass Trads are broken of their idolatry to the Mass and the Papacy, the better! Where’s my whiskey? Where’s my Xanax! Where’s my video game controller? Wait- I’m gonna yell at the dumb-asses and demand they give me money. Can you believe these maroons? Just yell at them and they give you THOUSANDS of dollars!

Pope Benedict tried to make Summorum Pontificum as well-defended as possible by deploying the “two forms of the same Rite” language.

But now, it’s up to others to step up. From Cardinal Princes to unlettered laynothings. This is total war, and total war requires EVERYONE to stand and fight. And die. Isn’t it funny how the grifters suddenly embrace the “hermitage” when shit gets real. Sadly, these psychos are so devoid of self awareness that they think no one sees straight through them.

I’ll see you all on the battlefield, and in front of the Tabernacle, where we are all brought together – Remnant Church Militant, Church Suffering, and Church Triumphant.

If you haven’t read Fr. Z’s post on the Bergoglian Antipapacy, and the Munus-Ministerium distinction, you should.

It’s a long piece, but very much worth the time. Here’s one of several punchlines, emphases mine:


“Let’s play the mind exercise out a little more and hack through some of the issues which I have heard raised by, for example, Ann Barnhardt, who is without question of the mind that Benedict is still Pope and Francis is a usurper antipope.  Along with Ann is a smart fellow with well-articulated arguments, Edward Mazza.

I’ll try to spin out what they have been discussing.  I hope I don’t put my foot wrong and mischaracterize their positions.  I’m happy to be corrected.

It seems that… in their view…

Benedict did NOT legitimately resign, because the language he used at the time he announced his resignation is confused. The confused language suggests that Benedict intended to resign the active dimension of his role, his ministerium (for example, doing stuff as Bishop of Rome and doing stuff as Pope to the larger world). However, he did not intend to resign his munus as Vicar of Christ.  Much turns on the technical term munus.

The fact is that munus and ministerium do not mean the same thing, though they are often bound together.  For example, one carries out a certain ministry in the Church because he holds an office, a munus.  Canon law says that the Pope has to resign the munus.  

Canon 332 §2: Si contingat ut Romanus Pontifex muneri suo renuntiet, ad validitatem requiritur ut renuntiatio libere fiat et rite manifestetur, non vero ut a quopiam acceptetur.  … If it should come to pass that the Roman Pontiff resigns his office, it is required for validity that the resignation is made freely and that it be properly manifested, but not that it is accepted by anyone.

But Benedict said in his resignation:

Quapropter bene conscius ponderis huius actus plena libertate declaro me ministerio Episcopi Romae, Successoris Sancti Petri, mihi per manus Cardinalium die 19 aprilis MMV commisso renuntiare ita ut a die 28 februarii MMXIII, hora 20, sedes Romae, sedes Sancti Petri vacet et Conclave ad eligendum novum Summum Pontificem ab his quibus competit convocandum esse.…  For this reason, and well aware of the seriousness of this act, with full freedom I declare that I renounce the ministry of Bishop of Rome, Successor of Saint Peter, entrusted to me by the Cardinals on 19 April 2005, in such a way, that as from 28 February 2013, at 20:00 hours, the See of Rome, the See of Saint Peter, will be vacant and a Conclave to elect the new Supreme Pontiff will have to be convoked by those whose competence it is.

Words have meanings.   It is not right simply to conflate munus and ministerium as if they are interchangeable.  They are closely tied to each other but they are not synonyms.  Not even close.”


Not. Even. Close.

Fr. Z later says:


“Remember:

If a Pope doesn’t resign willingly, the resignation is invalid.

If the Pope has in mind some sort of project papacy – like bifurcate it – and that project is in fact impossible, then the Pope is in substantial error and the resignation is invalid.

Can. 188 – A resignation made out of grave fear that is inflicted unjustly or out of malice, substantial error, or simony is invalid by the law itself.

Either way, duress or error, Benedict would still be Pope in the sense of being Vicar of Christ, for sure, and perhaps also of Bishop of Rome.”


Yup.

And as we are all getting a good, hard lesson in, the greatest act of violence one can do to the Papacy is not to deny that it exists, but rather to call a man who is not Peter, “Peter”.

Pray for Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger, the one and only living Vicar of Christ since April ARSH 2005, whether he likes it or not, the Papacy, and the Church Militant, infiltrated, occupied, and in terrifyingly visible eclipse.

July: Month of the Most Precious Blood of Jesus

Most Precious Blood of Life Eternal, price of sinful man’s redemption, by whose saving streams the thirst of souls is quenched, and their stains are washed away, Thou Who dost plead the cause of man before the throne of infinite mercy, from the depths of my heart I adore Thee and desire, as much as lies in my power, to make atonement for the injuries and insults that are constantly offered Thee by mankind, and especially by those who rashly dare to blaspheme Thee. Who will not bless and praise this Blood of infinite value? Whose soul would not be inspired with love for Jesus Who shed It all for us? What would be my fate, had I not been redeemed by this Divine Blood? And what drew Thee from the veins of my Savior even to the last drop? It was love! O boundless love, which has given us this saving balm! O priceless balm, welling from the fount of immeasurable love! Grant that all hearts and tongues may praise Thee, magnify Thee, and give Thee thanks, now and throughout all ages. Amen.

St. Gaspar del Bufalo, pray for us.

Most Precious Blood of Jesus, have mercy on us.