Sailors refusing obedience to a mutiny does not constitute disobedience to the original Captain.

— FrDave Nix 📡 (@FrDaveNix) July 19, 2021

Introduction

The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.

This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.

This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.

This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.

The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Denninger NAILS this little lying brat doctor in Alabama, spinning yarns which the Facebook-Google-Media combine pick up and run with.

The post-Christian culture is converging with the musloid culture more and more every day. Lying (taqiyya), child sex, child mutilation, honor killing, and on and on…

This Dr. Brytany Cobia lying psychopath brat is EXACTLY what Dr. Beep and Nurse Claire have warned us about. These millennial doctors are dishonest, unethical, emotionally incontinent, entitled, narcissistic brats that would kill you in a heartbeat without the slightest compunction in service to their Marxist, sodomitical, luciferian, post-Christian ideologies.

She’d kill you without even the slightest flutter of conscience.

Excerpting Denninger:

“I’m admitting young healthy people to the hospital with very serious COVID infections. One of the last things they do before they’re intubated is beg me for the vaccine. I hold their hand and tell them that I’m sorry, but it’s too late,” [Dr. Brytany Cobia] wrote.

“A few days later when I call time of death, I hug their family members and I tell them the best way to honor their loved one is to go get vaccinated and encourage everyone they know to do the same.”

This sort of lie should cost Ms. LIAR her license and everyone who ran this bull**** should be ruined.

Her “hospital” — any agency or entity that allows her to infest their premises should be flat-out destroyed along with every single person who works in any such place and gives her credibility by doing so.

Why?

This story is from Alabama.

Now I want you to look very carefully at this table.

Here’s the source link, complete with four separate copies of the same bull**** story in different “news” outlets.

According to that table not one person has died since the end of April in Alabama from Covid-19 according to that graph which goes through 7/20 — yesterday.

If you think the stakes here aren’t high, as in clearly justifying war, read this, just over the transom. Remember, George Washington was blowing peoples heads off for taxing his breakfast beverage.

Thanks to Nurse Claire and Dr Beep for proving there are some in the field who are not psychopathic liars.

I am a nurse and lactation consultant as well as a nurse practitioner student. My hospital just announced that they are going to mandate the covid jab as soon as it is FDA approved – which will be very soon.

I also have a private practice as a lactation consultant and use a billing company to contract with to accept some insurance plans. They have announced they will likely require the jab for their “partners.”

These are my sources of income. I have four children and am civilly divorced from someone who fits the description of a malignant narcissist.

I will fight this as best I can, but am seeing that I will be losing my job, my business, and likely my children in all of this.

Please pray for me.

Hi Ann:

Wanted to let you know, the lawyers are gearing up for what they know is coming. This CLE (continuing legal education) seminar is sponsored by the Colorado Bar Association. It’s a six hour course. They have never offered this course before.

“Remedies for Vaccination Injury Cases in Colorado: An Overview“

This debate between Dominican Fr. Gregory Pine and Dr. Janet Smith was very strongly recommended to me, and I committed the two-plus hours to watching it and wasn’t disappointed.  This is an EXCELLENT classical debate, and one can tell the quality of the participants is top-notch because you find yourself agreeing with whomever spoke last.

Folks, this question is coming hard and fast upon all of us: ARE YOU VACCINATED? is the new “Are there Jews in your attic?”

Normally, I wouldn’t recommend something that doesn’t come to a firm conclusion, but this question is something that everyone is going to have to grind their way through individually. This debate is going to give anyone who watches it a framework from which to start.

I started out firmly on the side of YOU CANNOT LIE with Fr. Pine, and for me personally, this policy has proved correct so many times, most dramatically in regards to my status as an “off the grid” person in contexts that COULD have resulted in significant legal consequences, but it was precisely because I was totally honest, not even engaging in mental reservation, that all dogs were almost miraculously instantly called off on several occasions.

I have also had the sad but valuable experience of crossing paths with several pathological liars and seeing the pure malignancy and toxicity of such reprobates.  As one repeatedly would say to me immediately after exiting the confessional, and thus very possibly invalidating the sacrament for herself, “Ha-HA! Off scott-free yet again! Gotta love the Sacraments…”

Lying is very, very, very bad, folks.

BUT, Dr. Smith makes some absolutely KILLER points – in fact, not just some, but many. MANY.

I think all adults need to sit down and watch this, even if in blocks, and not go bumbling forward into the Covidic Reich without giving serious, informed thought to the question of what you will do when you will inevitably be asked by a Covidic Gestapo with full powers of arrest and detention, and the mandate to take your children from you, “Are you vaccinated?”

Over the transom from Dr. Beep:

“There is something very very sickening and disconcerting about this. I think they expect a lot of people to start dying soon and they don’t want word getting out.”

Those darn meddling kids at The Pillar are doing some quality work.

Look at this doughy faggot. But, don’t worry. THEY WERE ALL 18, SO NO LAWS WERE BROKEN.

This piece of shit was promoted and protected precisely BECAUSE he is a filthy sodomite. Make absolutely no mistake. The only reason he’s out is because he got caught AND was exposed publicly. But he’ll just be sent to a cushy post out of the public eye, and his cruising for twinks on Grindr will continue apace. Hell, they’ll probably send him to Rome so he can party with Coccopalmerio and Capozzi.

I’ve said for years that some investigative outfit should go to Rome, get a phone and install Grindr and whatever the Italian equivalents are, set up a profile, and then just go stand in the front portico of St. Peter’s and watch the dozens and dozens of hits come up inside the Vatican.

Come Lord Jesus and burn it with fire. Do whatever you have to do. We aren’t going anywhere. Our hearts are ready.

Bill Gates has simply mapped the Microsoft Office 365 and computer antivirus subscription plans onto his poison injection and genocide fetish. Remember, monthly contraceptive injections like DepoProvera have been around for decades.

The fact that “monthly vaccine” makes absolutely no sense whatsoever doesn’t even matter. The UK is such a degenerated society that they’ll line up for this madness, and it will rapidly spread all over the world.

Elsewhere in Europe, Italy, apparently unfazed by the French uprising and approaching civil war, will be approving a mandatory “VaxxPass” regime tomorrow that will be required to enter any public space, INCLUDING CHURCHES.

Hmmmmm. I wonder WHICH sorts of parishes and chapels they will raid? I can’t even begin to hazard a guess…. 🤔

Roberto de Mattei was unavailable for comment.

Again, you could see all of this coming in, oh, I’d say late February of ARSH 2020.