Here is the closing of the ARSH 2017 letter from Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger to an unnamed German Cardinal that leaked today.

“Let us pray, as you did at the end of your letter, that the Lord comes to the rescue of His Church. I bless with my apostolic blessing,

Yours,

Benedict XVI”

Folks, the Apostolic Blessing is the PAPAL BLESSING.

“I bless with my apostolic blessing.”

And then signed with his Papal name.

But I’m the crazy one, and the Barnhardt Thesis is nothing more than the uneducated rantings of a “dippy” “convert”.

Youbetcha.

Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger, whether he likes it or not, is the one and only living and reigning Pope, having invalidly attempted to “partially resign” the Papacy these five years ago.  The Papacy can not be bifurcated nor fundamentally transformed into a “collegial, synodal office” by anyone, including the Pope himself, because the Papacy was established by Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ Himself.  For a Pope to attempt such in a resignation would render such resignation invalid per the “substantial error” clause in Canon 188.  The fact that we now have massive evidence that Pope Benedict XVI was coerced through fear of the violent, criminal homosexual coven now clearly occupying and controlling the Vatican, fear being another invalidating criterion per Canon 188, only confirms the obvious.

I would, at this point, bless you all with my Apostolic Blessing, but I can’t, because I’M NOT THE POPE.

So, I’ll just wish you a very good evening, and assure one and all of my continued prayers.

My response:

“Thanks.”

[The #TOLDYA in this email is now that people are seeing and hearing the truth about the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church being infiltrated by Freemasons, Communists and especially Sodomites (who were recruited, placed and promoted by the aforementioned infiltrators for the specific purpose of destroying the Church from the inside), they are realizing PRECISELY BECAUSE OF THE HORROR of the satanic attack on the Body and Bride of Christ that, YES, the Catholic Church, the last institution standing – even if seemingly feebly right now – against divorce and remarriage, contraception, abortion, sodomy and all the rest – is the One True Church.  It is now, when the sodomite infiltration is FINALLY being exposed and PUBLICLY ACKNOWLEDGED instead of being effeminately denied and turned a blind eye to, it is NOW that MEN are looking to enter The Church.  I have said for years now that one of the main things that drove men out of the Catholic Church in the first place was the EFFEMINATE REFUSAL TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THE FACT THAT MOST PRIESTS AND ALMOST ALL BISHOPS WERE HOMOSEXUALS.  Acknowledge the truth, hold it up in all its horror and ugliness for all the world to see, FIGHT BACK, and the men will come back. -AB]

Dear Ann,

I need to read your latest post (why you are still Catholic) more carefully because I’m finding myself silently fading away from the Church. My children are at a faithful Catholic school and I need to be their primary example, but I’m struggling mightily. Now, my husband is Lutheran,  and he is a fantastic man. He has supported raising the children Catholic and is happy to pay tuition. I’ve prayed many times for his conversion, but of the four people I’ve prayed very hard for, he is the one hold out. Until now. It’s crazy to me as I’m losing faith in the Church, he quietly inquired about RCIA that’s starting later this month. What timing. I mean, who in their right mind would choose to enter the Catholic Church now?? Clearly, God is not done with our Church because this man I married is a Lutheran from a long line of extremely stubborn Scandinavians, and he told me he’d never leave his Lutheran faith, and now he is doing so right as I’m quietly fading away. Obviously, I can’t very well leave it now and I must reaffirm my faith in the Church. What a gift I was just given in him, but also in your article because, I need that help to find my way back. My very faithful friends tell me that clearly God has decided it’s time to start calling the strong men into the Church because they are surprised my husband would choose now as well. Of course, God’s timing is never our own.

I’ll admit that I thought you were a little off-the-wall hard-core when I first stumbled upon you, but I’m beginning to see you were right all along. What a gift you have been given to be able to see so clearly.

So, thank you Ann. I will add you to my prayers more often.

God bless you.
Mrs. X

[Be assured of our prayers for your husband, but especially you, Mrs. X.  Might I also suggest trying to find a Latin Mass parish as your husband will be much, much better off receiving convert instruction from a Traditional priest in a Traditional parish, and I dare say your husband, being a manly man, will probably fall in love with the Traditional Mass, whose beauty is masculine, strong and transcendant.  Look for a parish run by either the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter, or the Institute of Christ the King.]

Do manfully and be of good heart: fear not, nor be ye dismayed at their sight: for the Lord thy God He Himself is thy leader, and will not leave thee nor forsake thee.

Viriliter agite, et confortamini : nolite timere, nec paveatis ad conspectum eorum : quia Dominus Deus tuus ipse est ductor tuus, et non dimittet, nec derelinquet te.
Deuteronomy 31: 6

Sometimes there IS videographic evidence.

The key point here is Bergoglio’s deployment of accusations of “political vendetta” and “conspiracy by intelligence agencies” EVEN WHEN THE BISHOP IN QUESTION WAS CAUGHT ON VIDEO HAVING HIMSELF ANALLY SODOMIZED BY HIS 23 YEAR OLD DRIVER, and that the episode was purely in the domain of the “private life” of Maccarone.

Just sit in stillness with that.

Let’s go to an Argentinian sleuth/translator for the truly sordid details of Antipope Bergoglio’s aggressive defense of Bishop Juan Carlos Maccarone:

Juan Carlos Maccarone

Summary: Bishop and Dean of the Faculty of Theology of the UCA, Pontifical University of Buenos Aires (Grand Chancellor at the time was Archbishop Jorge Bergoglio). Maccarone was a homosexual and a pedophile, and a 23 year old Alfredo Serrano filmed them in the act. Serrano published the video because Maccarone did not give him the job he’d promised (the reason for the faggotry in the first place). Maccarone died in 2015 and was given a Catholic Funeral.

More info, quotes, and sources:

• “Serrano maintained that he assumed that attitude in ‘revenge’ because the prelate had promised him that he would take steps to get him a job in the provincial public administration, the main labor source of the district of 500,000 inhabitants.” (from archived Univision article, in Spanish)
• The Episcopal Conference, released a declaration of solidarity with Maccarone. In this declaration they also express gratitude for Maccarone’s work on behalf of the poor and those under threat. This message was signed by Bergoglio, the president of the Conference Eduardo Mirás, Domingo Castagna, and Sergio Fenoy. (Spanish source)
• “Guillermo Marcó, spokesman for the archbishopric of Buenos Aires, considered that the resignation of Maccarone could be the result of  “political revenge for his fight for the needy in a province with impunity and a level of corruption that kept people in the more extreme poverty’.” (similar to Bergoglio’s stance on Grassi)
• Even though he resigned in 2005 after admitting a homosexual relationship, he was allowed by Bergoglio to celebrate the sacraments and officiate Masses. Including performing Confirmation Masses for teenagers. (originally reported in Clarin, in Spanish)
• “The homosexual pedophile Maccarone is an icon honored by the heretical “Priests for the Third World”, the leftist priests the ‘option for the poor’ of Argentina.”
• “The Mothers of Plaza de Mayo Association, through its president Hebe de Bonafini, sent a letter to Maccarone to express her “solidarity” and emphasize that “the Church of Jesus” is what he represents”
• “One of his successors is Bokalic, auxiliary Bishop under Bergoglio who was responsible for allowing homosexual sacrilege in the Church of Santiago del Estero Argentina.”

He Coulda Been a Contendah!

(excerpt from Spanish language blog announcing Maccarone’s death in ARSH 2015)

“In fact, when the scandal broke, the permanent commission of the CEA, chaired by Bergoglio at the time, produced a declaration of solidarity that produced an additional scandal. From Catholic Panorama ironically with an article that was published in various media .

Years after the scandal, he tried to wash the figure of Maccarone by making him discreetly reenter the ecclesiastical life during a ceremony in the Diocese of Venado Tuerto , Santa Fe, about which we also published an article that was published in international media.

Today La Nación dedicates an apology to him , as if his “inclinations” were not reprehensible even when those affected were minors, as in the case of Chascomús.

This intellectual, a great figure of the gay lobby, could not overcome the scandals, but under a more permissive pontificate with homosexuals, he could have become, as was the project of his close friends, Archbishop of Buenos Aires.”

Maccarone conferring the Sacrament of Confirmation for teenagers in ARSH 2010, fully five years after a video of him being sodomized by his young driver was made public. At the same time, he was “professor emeritus” at UCA, of which Bergoglio was the Grand Chancellor.

The folks over at ComplicitClergy.com have paid a transcription service to translate and subtitle the Natacha Jaitt “dinner” interview.

The key timestamps are:

4:13 – 7:07 She directly states that Gustavo Vera is a pedophile and runs a trafficking network. And that he uses his organization La Alameda to shut down his competition.

8:49 – 9:51 She recounts how Bergoglio saved pedophile priest Grassi and relocated him to a new area where he had access to vulnerable children.

[An Argentine reader has sent in this post made on an Argentine blog that focuses on exposing the crimes of Antipope Bergoglio (and there are MANY such blogs – how could NO ONE in the world of journalism have bothered to check out the Argentine internet for these five years?? It’s not as if Spanish speakers are exactly rare in the U.S.).  Even in rough translation, I found this blogger’s thesis of “Institutional Cannibalism” to be extremely prescient and contributive.  Apparently by now, this term “Institutional Cannibalism” is widely used in Argentina to describe Antipope Bergoglio and what he did to the Church in Argentina, and is now doing to the global institutional Church.  Thanks again to our Argentine sources.  Keep the content coming!  And be assured of all of our prayers.  -AB]

This was written in 2013 by an Argentinian blogger about Bergoglio and is often referenced by the author in future posts relating to the anti-pope and his controversies. It’s beautiful description of one of the core dynamics at work in his anti-papacy. Translated below by a volunteer, with minor edits for clarity.

Notes On Institutional Cannibalism

(I) Institutional cannibalism refers to an individual feeding off of the bad reputation of an institution they belong to, [publicly] accepting the pejorative versions, the prejudices and the slanders, [then publicly] opposing them and consequently “saving face” in a self-serving way. When exercised by someone holding the highest and most visible role in the institution, it can reach the rank of betrayal. Frequently this “saving face” is usually defended as a way to preserve the salvageable aspects the denigrated institution, which is rescued, in theory, by the triumph of the cannibal: “this organization cannot be so bad if it supports a President this good “.

(II) It is distinguished from a healthy self-criticism by the perspective of those who practice it, which is usually exogenous and close to the politically correct or current thinking. The criticism of the institutional cannibal, explicit or tacit, is no different in essence from that of the enemy. [Or it is silent] with respect to the enemy’s critiques. In any case, the “cannibal” doesn’t point out the enemy’s mistakes, no does he exalt the principles that bother the enemy of the institution.

(III) The institutional cannibal gives the impression of being alienated from the institution. It is as if he had arrived by chance, and then distanced himself. The criticisms he makes could be made by a newcomer, or a parvenu. When he represents the institution, he does it as an actor, as if he exerts a role imposed upon him, which he strips with joy at the end of the show, exhausted by the performance. The institution, its bases and its history are under his entire judgment and examination, he does not assume this as an axiom but as a problem. [Not far from my mind is] Napoleon, when he uttered, “from Clovis to the Convention, I take charge of everything.”

(IV) The paradox is that this alienation usually coexists with an attitude of empowerment never before seen. The cannibal regards it as his own, and at the same time rejects it. He is a master, not a representative. As such owner, it is considered in perfect right to devour and redo it. He is an heir with perpetual inventory benefit.

(V) The institutional cannibal is not the counterpart of the triumphalist, but rather its opposite. While the triumphalist pretends to own the fame of the institution, exalting it and himself in an idolatrous fusion that makes him lose his soul, his principles and the purpose of the institution itself (which will be justified, of course, as merely desiring to bring greater glory), the institutional cannibal, with the same attitude and intention, with the same anthropic and Pelagian impetus, privatizes triumphalism, exalting only himself. He will ask forgiveness for the crimes and errors of the institution, rarely his own.

(VI) *The institutional cannibal aims to replace the prestige of centuries with his fame, the rich earth of History with the weeds/sickness of public approbation.* With the old books, the centuries old furniture, the venerable clothes, he raises a bonfire that shines with a brilliance never before seen. The next morning you will find ashes. Like a reverse Cronos, he will be devoured by his son.

———————————–

*El caníbal institucional pretende sustituir con su fama el prestigio de siglos. Con las malezas de la aprobación popular, el humus de la Historia.

The message is that the institutional cannibal seeks to upend both history and the rich earth of tradition, from which the insitution grew and produced fruit, and replace them with a cult of personality based on popular approval.

In Argentina, I have sometimes heard the word “maleza” colloquially used as “curse.”

FOR AGGRESSIVE REPRINTING AND DISTRIBUTION IN ORDER TO THWART/ENDRUN ANY POTENTIAL CENSORSHIP OR CYBER ATTACKS. PLEASE.

[Once again, this whistleblower isn’t anyone’s ideal.  But what do you expect?  And, let me be the first to point out, this guy, along with Natacha Jaitt is literally risking his life in talking about this stuff. Bergoglio, Vera, et. al. are satanic murderers.  More to come in this space. Please lift up the Argentine translator/sleuths providing this content in English in prayer. -AB]

Natacha Interviews Artem #1 Summary

• Artem Reshetnyak (Ukrainian) introduces himself. He’s lives in Argentina and is engaged to a known escort named Lucilla, who is originally from Uruguay. They’ve been together for 3 years.
• He ran a blog from Summer 2013 – Fall 2017 where he publicly denounced the pedophilic and sex trafficking network led by Gustavo Vera. He conducted his own investigation for these posts
• He says an official came to his home (where he lived with Lucilla) and gave a warning: his girlfriend had to stop promoting herself (as a prostitute) – Gustavo’s orders – and if he didn’t stop talking about Gustavo online they would kill him. He doesn’t share the name of this officer.
• He wrote an article about how the media gives a false impression on the nature of human trafficking, focusing on the adult female victims and not mentioning the children and male victims. Says homosexual and pedophilic sex slavery is more common.
• He agrees with Jaitt when she says that La Alameda promises to help victims working in poor conditions in illegal sweatshops, but instead takes advantage of them. He was contacted by an informant (who he wants to keep confidential) who divulged information on the criminal activities of the organization: sex trafficking, pedophilia, blackmail.
• He started working with Martes Rojos, a Latino organization dedicated to ending sex trafficking in the most vulnerable neighborhoods.
• Natacha says everything he’s reporting confirms what she’s been working on – La Alameda subjugates the very people they’re claiming to liberate. Artem agrees and says that Gustavo Vera manages this network, he’s directly involved in its operation. The video cuts off as he is talking about sharing data against Vera.

Natacha Interviews Artem #2 Summary:

• Sources of income that fund Gustavo Vera: Bergoglio and also extorting sweatshops using illegal hiring practices (Gustavo’s mafia gets paid to not alert authorities to the crimes of these businesses)
• Another source of funds is selling drugs. Uses the organization to gain an advantage over local gangs, just like La Alameda is used to shut down brothel competition. They selectively target areas and then install their own network. This network is not like the local gang culture, which abides by a traditional code of conduct, e.g. the La Alameda mafia sells drugs to school children, because once they are hooked on drugs they are easier for La Alameda manipulate.
• Lucia Perez, the victim of abuse and ultimately murder at the hand of Gustavo’s mafia.
• Children are kidnapped (one group that does the kidnapping – the Stolen Childhood Network, which claims to be a group to help children) from the poorer neighborhoods and are victims of the pedophile network which also brings in a lot of income.
• Natasha repeats the idea that these children are targeted because they have no resources, no power, the judicial system is not concerned with maintaining their safety or upholding the law in their case. She equates it to the prostitution and pedophilia networks run in the soccer leagues. Artem agrees with everything she’s saying.
• The headquarters of the human trafficking operation is the in the Northern part of the country but the network has an international reach: Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, Chile, Peru, Spain, Italy, including Rome. There’s a big demand for blonde European children.
• There are many other important people involved in addition to Gustavo Vera – Juan Carr (runs The Solidarity Network) whose organization pretends to look for missing children but actually kidnaps children. They give false hope to families who have missing children, when they find the child they keep the child as a sex slave.

• Bergoglio provides funding and protection for La Alameda and allows the Catholic elite in Rome to have access to the children. Creating centers for disadvantaged children makes the children dependent on them, because they have no resources other than the Church.

Additional Supporting Documentation/Links

Artem’s claims reinforced Jaitt’s points, but I wanted to find a few more sources to show that he isn’t the only one to be suspicious about Gustavo Vera, La Alameda, Bergoglio, and other bad priests. He’s very direct and to the point in his interview so these links should provide more context and help support the idea that there is something corrupt going on.

• • Periodico Tribuna (Spanish, 2017): Gustavo Vera fue expulsado del Vaticano
    • Says that Gustavo’s organization was a sham, claimed to fight against slavery and human trafficking but instead profited from these very things. Specifically mentions blackmailing sweatshop owners, echoing what Artem says in the video.
    • Believes Gustavo being banned from the Vatican is because the Pope only recently found out about this (eyeroll). Also claims “The Vatican has eyes and ears everywhere in the world, and much more in the Nation from which the Pontiff of the day originates.”
    • Also hints at drug trafficking, says more information coming in a later article.
  • The Nation (September 2015): How Pope Francis Is Reviving Radical Catholic Economics
    • This is a pro-Bergoglio article praising how he’s changing the Church in a leftward direction. Quotes:
      • “The same mind-set which stands in the way of making radical decisions to reverse the trend of global warming also stands in the way of achieving the goal of eliminating poverty.” – Bergoglio
      • ““He’s a person who comes from walking through the poor neighborhoods, from walking with those who are in very bad conditions, from being with the unions and all that,” says Néstor Escudero, a member of the Argentine NGO La Alameda, which opposes human trafficking and organizes cooperatives among victims. Bergoglio lent his presence and protection to La Alameda, along with other groups that faced danger because of their work.”
      • “He came of age in the heyday of Peronism in Argentina, and he learned from the Peróns how to walk a kind of both-and line between a Marxist’s identification with the masses and a conservative’s savvy among the powers that be.”
  • La Stampa (2016)
    • “The Pope denied allegations that Gustavo Vera, a professor, politician and social activist and Francis’ longtime friend and collaborator, acts as his spokesperson.”
    • Relevant because so many articles across the internet, in English and Spanish, have Vera speaking about the Pope as if he were the spokesman. For years Vera does this while seeing the Pope every other month and chatting on the phone weekly. Surely Bergoglio would have told him to stop if he didn’t like it? Another instance of his words not lining up with his actions.
  • Explanation on the Lucia Perez case
    • 16 year old girl murdered on October 8 2016 by Matías Farías (23) and Juan Pablo Offidani (41). Alejandro Maciel (61) charged with aggravated cover up. Drugged, suffocated, raped, beaten, and murdered. Then they cleaned her up, changed her clothes, and took her dead body to a health centre to make it look like she overdosed. (Source)
  • Washington Post (2013): Pope Francis was often quiet on Argentine sex abuse cases as archbishop
    • Talks about Grassi case, confirming everything shared in the other doc
    • “But during most of the 14 years that Bergoglio served as archbishop of Buenos Aires, rights advocates say, he did not take decisive action to protect children or act swiftly when molestation charges surfaced; nor did he extend apologies to the victims of abusive priests after their misconduct came to light.”
    • “He has been totally silent,” said Ernesto Moreau, a member of Argentina’s U.N.-affiliated Permanent Assembly for Human Rights and a lawyer who has represented victims in a clergy sexual-abuse case. Victims asked to meet with Bergoglio but were turned down, Moreau said. “In that regard, Bergoglio was no different from most of the other bishops in Argentina, or the Vatican itself.”

• Another Argentinian abuser: Father Mario Napoleon Sasso assigned to work with children even though he was a known abuser

• Father Mario Napoleon Sasso

• • Washington Post (2013)
    • “After local parishioners accused Father Mario Napoleon Sasso of molesting children in a poor, rural province of eastern Argentina in the early 1990s, he was sent to a private rehabilitation center for wayward clergy, La Domus Mariae (the House of Mary), north of Buenos Aires. He lived for two years at the center and was then reassigned to work in a soup kitchen for poor children in a town outside the capital. There, he went on to sexually abuse girls as young as 3.”
    • “Moreau said that in 2003 he accompanied two nuns and a priest who had denounced Sasso, along with the victims’ families, to a meeting with the Vatican emissary in Buenos Aires. He said the families were told to be “patient” and were offered gifts of rosaries “blessed by the pope.” “They just wanted to cover it up,” Moreau said.
    • “Three years later, as the evidence against Sasso mounted, the families asked to see Bergoglio, Moreau said, but they never received a response.”
  • Bishop Accountability Report with 17 additional sources linked on his abuse
• Cardinal Mario Aurelio Poli (Argentina)
  • NCR (2014): Francis’ cardinal replacement in Buenos Aires has similar pastoral approach
    • Cardinal Mario is one of the 19 cardinals Jorge promoted January 2014. He was born in 1947 ordained in 1978.
    • Described as quiet, low profile, not political, conciliatory, promotes inter faith dialogue, concerned for the poor.
    • “He’s a person permanently consulting with the pope. … It’s no surprise to anyone that he has been speculated about (for) this possible appointment,”
    • “In Buenos Aires, Pope Francis was a towering figure. He left a legacy of living austerely, walking the streets of the slums, taking the metro and declining social events. He also provided attention to the poor and spoke out on political matters”
  • Catholic News Agency (2014): Cardinal-elect Poli, Buenos Aires’ successor to Bergoglio
    • Lists good things he has done as Archbishop, stresses his lack of political involvement.
    • “The Argentine publication was told by a source that “Bergoglio designated as bishops those most close to his thought. We will not see more bishops with ‘princely’ or ‘stately’ styles.””
    • “Another source indicated that Archbishop Poli “never took an interest in politics, nor does he participate in the ‘threat’, or meet with leaders early in the morning as did Bergoglio,” adding that he “fosters Catholic schools, and takes care that ‘the sheep are well.’”
  • The Guardian (2015): Archbishop of Westminster is made a cardinal by Pope Francis
    • Only relevant quote: “It had been considered almost inevitable that the pope’s successor as archbishop of Buenos Aires, Mario Aurelio Poli, would be named.”
  • Infovaticana.com (Spanish): ¿Quién es Mario Aurelio Poli?
    • Speaks extremely highly of Bergoglio. Praises his style, his ideas, his approach as “Pope”. Supports the idea of “new evangelization”, “lowering the Church to the level of the people” to better “connect” and facilitate their “encounter” with the Spirit, etc. etc.
  • Perfil.com (Spanish, May 2018): Crece la movilización en la calle y la Iglesia apoya sus reclamos
  • La Arena (Spanish, 2012): Obispo Poli, vinculado a “red de silencio”
    • Sebastián Quattromo (13) was abused by Fernando Enrique Picciochi at the Marianista de Caballito School’s annual camping trip in the early 90s. Years later he reported this to the school and the Church, who only tried to keep him silent.
    • “Quattromo gave an interview to Página 12 that was published in their Sunday edition, revealing that in early 2000, he, together with a peer who suffered the same abuses, were put through a process of mediation, and the institution, in order to avoid a civil case, compensated them $40,000, but not before they signed a confidentiality clause.”
    • “Although Quattromo accepted the terms, he ultimately took this imposition of silence to the Legal Council of the City of Buenos Aires, who determined that he was in the right.”
    • “I then went to the Archbishop, where I was attended by a secretary of Monsignor Jorge Bergoglio, a man who identified himself as Martín García Aguirre,” said Quattromo
    • “I laid out my case to him, along with the measures that the Catholic institution took to silence my ex-classmate and me.” He sent me to the District Vicarage of Flores, where I had two interviews with the man in charge, Father Mario Poli. I once again laid out my case and the measures taken. But I never heard back.”
  • La Alameda Blog: Misa por las víctimas de trata, la esclavitud y la exclusión
    • Celebrated mass to end human trafficking in the Constitutional Plaza in partnership with La Alameda. Gustavo Vera attended and spoke.
    • Also present: La Campora, Equipo de Sacerdotes para las Villas de Emergencia, las Hermanas Oblatas del Santísimo Redentor, las Hermanas Adoratrices Españolas, la Red KAWSAY, y el Movimiento de Trabajadores Excluidos.
• Pino Solanas (this is more of a character sketch to show the types of people involved in La Alameda)
• Movie producer and revolutionary connected with La Alameda (see photo of him and Vera)
• “Solanas was at the forefront of the Grupo Cine Liberación that shook Argentine cinema in the 1970s, developing its social conscience and political voice. He was active in the campaign to support Perón”
• Ran for president in 2007 in the Authentic Socialist Party, in 2009 he became the National Deputy for Buenos Aires, in 2013 election National Senator for Buenos Aires.
• Started his own political party: Proyecto Sur “The party’s progressive platform centers on environmentalism, social democracy and eco-socialism, and the nationalization of energy, petroleum, rail, and shipping concerns”
• Pro abortion and wanted to legalize it in Argentina
• Vera, Pino, Bergoglio on the same team: http://www.lavoz.com.ar/politica/gustavo-vera-y-fernando-pino-solanas-somos-la-opcion-macri-y-massa
  • Spanish interview where Vera and Pino talk about their shared mission and support of the Pope, opposition to Macri, and love of Laudato Si.

[Originally Penned and posted on 6 March, ARSH 2016.  Given Antipope Bergoglio’s new tack of accusing the victims and whistleblowers of being themselves the cause of scandal, of being little satans, this piece is a must-read. Its follow-up on the sin of scandal – REAL scandal – will be next.]

To review, a Diabolical Narcissist is a person who has freely chosen, exactly as the fallen angels (satan and the demons) did, to purge themselves of all charity and are thus voluntarily incapable of love or empathy, and whose entire emotional palate is thus limited to anger, hatred, jealousy and fear. Diabolical Narcissists are often of above-average or even genius-level intelligence, are usually accomplished in their fields, and can be desperately charming.  They are also inveterate and facile liars, and almost all aberrosexuals (homosexuals, asexuals, transvestites, pedophiles, etc.) are Diabolical Narcissists.  Diabolical Narcissists are vampiric and hold special malice for people who are loving, happy, grateful and empathetic – which is why children are often their targets. Diabolical Narcissists identify targets whom they then “hunt”, with the intent of crushing the target such that the target is likewise purged of all charity.  And the wheels of the bus go ’round and ’round. Their sole motivation, like the demons, is pure, unadulterated spite.

The term “Gaslighting” comes from a play, later made into a film in ARSH 1944 starring Ingrid Bergman, called “Gaslight” about a woman whose husband attempts to convince her and those around them that she is insane. Gaslighting, as we will see, is a near omnipresent tactic of Diabolical Narcissists, and is tied closely to the grave sin of scandal – one of the most overlooked sins of our day, and that is saying something indeed. The next essay in this series will be on Scandal.

The formal definition of gaslighting is as follows:

“a form of mental abuse in which information is twisted or spun, selectively omitted to favor the abuser, or false information is presented with the intent of making victims doubt their own memory, perception, and sanity…Sociopaths frequently use gaslighting tactics. Sociopaths consistently transgress social mores, break laws, and exploit others, but typically, are also charming and convincing liars who consistently deny wrongdoing. Thus, some who have been victimized by sociopaths may doubt their perceptions.”

In short, gaslighting is the Diabolical Narcissist playing the “you’re crazy” card, almost always in response to the Diabolical Narcissist being confronted about or called on their malignant behavior. This can range from the relatively subtle, passive-aggressive (sometimes referred to as “ambient abuse”), such as a DN giving someone the cold shoulder or silent treatment, up to tyrant oligarchs or antipopes accusing their victims/political enemies of being mentally unstable. Accusations of insanity and imprisonment of political enemies in “mental hospitals” has been a favored tactic of Marxists in particular over the past century.

In the micro context, say between a DN husband and wife, a friendship between a DN and a normal person, or a workplace relationship between a DN and co-worker (subordinate or not), the DN, after identifying and grooming his target, will then turn on them suddenly with extreme passive-aggression, most commonly beginning with the silent treatment. When finally confronted by the concerned and confused target, the DN will DENY ANY WRONGDOING.

“I have no idea what you’re talking about.”
“I can’t believe I’m even having this conversation.”
“This is all some fantasy inside your head.”
“You’re crazy.”

Depending on the strength or weakness of the target, and the context, this cycle can go on for years or even decades.

Oftentimes, the DN will then begin a campaign amongst the family, friends or colleagues of his victim trying to convince them of the “irrationality” of his victim’s concerns, that his victim is “detached from reality”. This is where the DN really gets to flex his charm, and as we have discussed previously, the DN oftentimes derives more narcissistic satisfaction from the “getting away with it”, in this case the manipulation and “winning over” of the surrounding group, be it the couple’s children, the shared social circle, or co-workers.  With politicians and high-level clergy, this “manipulating the group” and “getting away with it” is played out on a national or global scale.

When the DN is ready and is sure he can get away with it, he will escalate the level and openness of the abusive behavior to something like shouting obscenities or raging at his target in a public place, or at home in front of witnesses. Or, as a random example, spewing heresy on a near-daily basis.  Now here is where it gets interesting.

Now that others have eyewitnessed the DN’s narcissistic rage, the DN pivots his gaslighting tactics. The DN now insists that the fact that the target was hurt, upset or offended by the DN’s actions IS ITSELF THE PROOF THAT THE TARGET IS MENTALLY IMPAIRED OR WORSE. This is where they play the “crazy” card.

Remember, DNs are obsessed with the projection of their false self, a diabolical grandiose persona that they themselves create in order to convince themselves that they are perfect, separate, above, without peer, and that the rules simply do not apply to them. Therefore, the DN believes himself incapable of wrongdoing or sin, and if confronted with his or her own wrongdoing or sin, the immediate “damage control” response is to impugn the very sanity of anyone who would dare question his behavior. After all, if the DN was made to scream obscenities at the target in public, the target must have REALLY had it coming, and in a sense should be grateful to the DN for putting up with them at all, right?

This is how these people think. This is how nearly every single politician and Catholic bishop today thinks. These people truly believe that you, the lowly vermin, should be GRATEFUL TO THEM when they look you in the eye and lie to you, rob you blind, or even rape your children, because they tolerate your existence… for now. And if you aren’t grateful? If you dare ask questions or challenge them? Well, you’re clearly insane, should be mandatorily tested for “depression”, and obviously should not be permitted anywhere near a firearm….

Tragically, I’ll bet we can all think of micro-examples of people we have known or are related to who have been in truly abusive situations or relationships like this. And even though I am using the masculine pronoun to refer to the DN, we all know of DN females who rage at their targets, oftentimes their husbands, children or workplace subordinates.  Female politicians are especially notorious for such hideous behavior towards underlings.

In the case of submissive male targets of female DNs, there is a vulgar descriptor for these men:  p****whipped. And as the Marxist doctrine of feminism, which is simply the inculcation of girls and women into Diabolical Narcissism, creates more and more female DNs, the number of effeminate, *whipped men as a percentage of the post-Christian, post-western populace has now gone parabolic.

A prime example of a Diabolical Narcissist using accusations of mental instability against his enemies is Antipope Bergoglio. Here is what he said recently (ARSH 2016) about priests and seminarians who are devout and pious Catholics:

“There are often young men who are psychologically unstable without knowing it and who look for strong structures to support them. For some it is the police or the army but for others it is the clergy,” the pope said. However, the pope said he personally finds it worrisome when a priest takes pride in being extremely devout. “When a youngster is too rigid, too fundamentalist, I don’t feel confident (about him). Behind it there is something he himself does not understand. Keep your eyes open!”

Sadly, DNs are often extremely successful in this as they have a tendency to pick as targets of their narcissistic rage and malice weak but kindhearted personalities who will capitulate to their manipulations. If you should happen to watch the movie “Gaslight” after reading this, you will see that Ingrid Bergman’s character folds like a cheap shirt – almost unbelievably fast, which is a main critique of the screenplay. But, on occasion, a DN will come up against a person who is solidly grounded in Reality, and thus cannot be gaslighted in this way. When this happens, the DN transitions to his final tactic: impugning the character of his target.

Again, the Diabolical Narcissist MUST maintain his false facade of perfection, therefore if he turns on someone and the “crazy” gambit simply doesn’t play, he MUST be morally justified in having done so – the target MUST be an evil person.

As you may have noticed, this is the post-western, post-Christian, “social justice warrior” mentality. If you have a problem with your eight year old child being taught about anal sodomy in school, YOU ARE AN EVIL PERSON.  If you have a problem with unborn children being slaughtered and their body parts traded on the open market – YOU ARE AN EVIL PERSON.  If you do not fully capitulate to the fiction of “global warming” – YOU ARE AN EVIL PERSON. If you have a problem with your nation being conquered by musloids – YOU ARE AN EVIL PERSON.

If you have a problem with clerics and prelates, including cardinals, groping, fellating and ass raping lads and seminarians – YOU ARE AN EVIL PERSON.

If you actually believe what the Catholic Church has believed and taught infallibly for 2000 years – YOU ARE AN EVIL PERSON.

Think of O.J. standing over Nicole’s almost-decapitated body, saying, “Bitch, you made me kill you.”

Think of Cardinal McCarrick telling the terrified 11 year old boy he just manually brought to orgasm, “See? I knew you wanted to do that.”

Or, think of Antipope Bergoglio, standing over the almost-decapitated body of Holy Mother Church saying, “Christians who obstinately maintain ‘it’s always been done this way,’ this is the path, this is the street—they sin: the sin of divination. It’s as if they went about by guessing: ‘What has been said and what doesn’t change is what’s important; what I hear—from myself and my closed heart—more than the Word of the Lord.’ Obstinacy is also the sin of idolatry: the Christian who is obstinate sins! The sin of idolatry.”

This is a very, very simplistic primer and introduction to the concept of gaslighting, but I think it is enough for you to start identifying and calling out these dynamics, especially when you see them from politicians and tyrants like Antipope Bergoglio. Also, perhaps there will be some of you who recognize this behavior in your own lives, both past and present.

Remember, the basics of gaslighting are:

1. DN abusing target in order to gain diabolical satisfaction (spite)
2. DN accusing target of being crazy for objecting to or being hurt by DN
3. DN character assassinating target who refuses to acquiesce to DN (secondary diabolical satisfaction in “getting away with it”)

The next Diabolical Narcissism essay will be about Scandal, which is often a direct corollary to gaslighting, and is directly responsible for countless human souls being lost to hell. Diabolical Narcissists truly are Hell’s Mercenaries….

Here is an excerpt of a 2017 French documentary, which I have been told is available free on Amazon Prime, called “Sex Abuse in the Church: The Code of Silence.”  But this eleven minute excerpt is packed with information, and Antipope Bergoglio LYING THROUGH HIS TEETH on camera in St. Peter’s Square as he is arriving for a Wednesday Audience.

If you haven’t read the previous post from an Argentinian sleuth/translator about the boy-raping Argentine “celebrity priest” Julio Grassi and Antipope Bergoglio’s enabling and protecting of Grassi for YEARS, including knowingly placing him in a parish with a ministry to young, impoverished boys, and Bergoglio almost certainly giving orders for physical beatings and menacing harassment of witnesses against Grassi, READ THAT HERE.

The key part of this excerpt (although I recommend watching the whole clip) comes at the 9:18 timestamp.  The producers, in St. Peter’s Square in the front row for the Wednesday Audience, have a letter detailing the Grassi case and specifically inquiring about Bergoglio’s role and actions.  They are able to hand the letter to a plainclothes Swiss Guard as Antipope Bergoglio passes by.  Then, Antipope Bergoglio having exited the AntipopeMobile walks past and the woman asks him directly with him fully paying attention to her TWICE, “…in the Grassi case, did you try to influence Argentinian justice?”  That is at the 10:26 timestamp.  Look at the malevolence on his face.

His reply, “No…”

She follows up: “No? Then why did you commission a counterinquiry?”

Antipope Bergoglio then says, “I never did.”

Now, by this point, the fact that these evil, evil people lie with utter facility should be of zero surprise to anyone.  BUT, alas, people still…still…at long last STILL assume that Diabolical Narcissist Psychopath sex perverts like Antipope Bergoglio would NEVER lie.  So, it is good for irrefutable videographic evidence to get out into the world, so that maybe one or two people will finally realize that these people, like their father satan, are remorseless, inveterate liars.

Boy rapists, believe it or not, consider themselves to be ELITE.  They consider sodomitical rape of boys and lads to be the highest form of “sexuality”.  Look at the entire islamic political system and its explicit repeated preference and adulation of sodomy with “pearl boys” in the koran.  Look at the founding base of the Nazi Party – all sodomites, with Ernst Rohm, head of the S.A. whom Hitler finally had killed in the Night of the Long Knives, being an OPEN pederast, publicly declaring pederasty as a superior and intrinsic quality of the neo-pagan cult of the Third Reich – “real men, real warriors, shun copulation with females, and instead service each other, preferably by “mentoring” boys and lads.”  Look at the Legionaries of Christ, who to this day market themselves as a movement of “Catholic Elites” and a “New Catholic Aristocracy”, that was founded by a bisexual incestuous pedophile, and whose schools and seminaries have been nothing more than sex and sodomy cruising grounds for high-ranking Legion of Christ priests.

These people are so far gone, so deeply descended into their own self-excavated pits of sin, that they literally believe that their homosexuality and taste for boyflesh is a proofset that they are SUPERIOR BEINGS.  I have had seminarians tell me that the sodomite clique in their seminary house would sit around and hold forth on how “low class” it is for a man to be attracted to women – that they, as Sodomites, are so superior in intellect, culture and refinement that it is simply impossible to be so “trashy” as to NOT be repulsed by women, most especially physically.  Heterosexuality is for the peasant class, for the simpletons.  And yes, these monsters are still VERY MUCH in the seminaries and being ordained.

Remember well the axiom I was told years ago which applies to all women: “Ann, if the faggots DON’T hate your guts, then you need to examine your conscience.”

So if you are slowly starting to get the feeling that these men like Bergoglio, Donna Wuerl, the Hollywood fags, the fags in the press and media, that these men hold you in contempt, and seem to be rubbing all of this in your faces, and laughing while they do it, you are absolutely right.