Timestamps for Part 2 Bergoglian Antipapacy Video
00:00 Introduction and Acknowledgments 03:13 The answer to this controversy lies in CANON LAW because it revolves around a JURIDICAL OFFICE and a JURIDICAL ACT, specifically the 1983 Code 05:46 Canon 188 Review 06:45 What exactly is the definition of SUBSTANTIAL ERROR? 09:26 The massive difference and distinction between OFFICE (an ontological state of being) … Continue reading Timestamps for Part 2 Bergoglian Antipapacy Video
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed